Enhancing the materiality principle in integrated reporting by adopting the General Systems Theory

Author:

Aprile Roberto1,Alexander David2,Doni Federica3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Management University of Bergamo Bergamo Italy

2. Business School University of Birmingham Birmingham UK

3. Department of Business & Law University of Milano‐Bicocca Milano Italy

Abstract

AbstractThis article aims to explore the effectiveness of the materiality principle (MP) within Integrated Reporting (IR) by applying the General Systems Theory (GST) of Ludwig von Bertalanffy. GST, within its holistic approach, can be used to identify the main sub‐systems in which the regulation of IR can be articulated and the relationships between themselves, to make the MP effective, thereby improving the quality of the IR regulation. While much research has analyzed the materiality assessment and its impact on disclosure, little is known about how regulation affects the effectiveness of this principle. This research addresses this gap by explaining that materiality is not a stand‐alone principle but needs to be supported by other principles to be effectively enacted. Our findings can improve the materiality assessment by providing a better understanding of the materiality meaning that can be helpful for managers, standard setters and professional bodies. In terms of research implications, this provides a framework for an alternative thought process for simplification without sacrificing the proper breadth of stakeholder focus.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Strategy and Management,Development

Reference112 articles.

1. The International Integrated Reporting Council: A call to action

2. Accounting and organizations: Realizing the richness of field research;Ahrens T.;Journal of Management Accounting Research,1998

3. Alexander D. Aprile R. &Magnaghi E.(2015).Integrated reporting: A first analysis of the current situation of its framework in the light of the comment letters received (paper presented at the Congrès AFC 2015 Toulouse France).

4. Ecological economics: A Luhmannian analysis of integrated reporting

5. Intellectual capital and sustainable development: a systematic literature review

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3