Faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new competency‐based emergency medicine standardized letter of evaluation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new competency‐based emergency medicine standardized letter of evaluation

Published:2024-09-12 Issue:5 Volume:8 Page:
ISSN:2472-5390
Container-title:AEM Education and Training
language:en
Short-container-title:AEM Education and Training

Author:

Schnapp Benjamin¹^ORCID,Sehdev Morgan²^ORCID,Schrepel Caitlin³^ORCID,Bord Sharon⁴^ORCID,Pelletier‐Bui Alexis⁵^ORCID,Alvarez Alai⁶^ORCID,Dubosh Nicole M.⁷^ORCID,Park Yoon Soo⁸,Shappell Eric⁹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA

2. Harvard‐Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency Brigham and Women's Hospital/Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

3. Department of Emergency Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

4. Department of Emergency Medicine The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA

5. Department of Emergency Medicine Cooper Medical School of Rowan University Camden New Jersey USA

6. Department of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto California USA

7. Department of Emergency Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

8. Department of Medical Education University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois USA

9. Department of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEmergency medicine (EM) has introduced a new, competency‐based standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE) template. While a previous version of the SLOE has been shown to promote a high degree of faculty consensus regarding competitiveness, this has not been shown for the new SLOE template.ObjectiveThe objective was to evaluate faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new EM SLOE 2.0.MethodsFifty mock SLOE 2.0 letters using the new template were drafted and sent to a group of experienced EM educators. The 50 letters were ranked by the experienced faculty as well as a point‐based prediction model and a regression model and the results were compared.ResultsFaculty consensus on competitiveness remained strong when using the new SLOE 2.0 format. The points‐based prediction model and regression model both demonstrated a high level of agreement with faculty consensus rankings for the SLOE 2.0.ConclusionsIntroduction of the new, competency‐based SLOE 2.0 format did not have a deleterious effect on faculty consensus rankings of competitiveness.

Publisher

Wiley

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/aet2.11024

Reference9 articles.

1. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for the Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Standardized Letter of Evaluation. Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Accessed April 23 2024.https://cdn.ymaws.com/apgo.org/resource/resmgr/rrr/SLOE_FAQ_22‐23_05.11..22.pdf

2. The Standardized Letter of Evaluation for Postgraduate Training

3. A Comparison of Standardized and Narrative Letters of Recommendation

4. Pediatric, Surgery, and Internal Medicine Program Director Interpretations of Letters of Recommendation

5. Official cord standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE). Published online July 19 2022. Accessed April 23 2024.https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uKXHlyj1j5WfOnUGMYAHgsF4HWESdyzq/view