Impact of an automated patient outcome feedback system on emergency medicine resident patient follow‐up: An interrupted time series analysis

Author:

Rudolf Frances1ORCID,Oyama Leslie C.1,El‐Kareh Robert23

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine University of California San Diego San Diego California USA

2. Department of Medicine University of California San Diego San Diego California USA

3. Department of Quality University of California San Diego San Diego California USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesEmergency medicine (EM) residents desire, but often lack, reliable feedback of patient outcomes following handoffs to other providers. This gap is a substantial barrier to calibrating their diagnostic decision making and learning. To address this educational priority, we developed and evaluated the Post‐Handoff Reports of Outcomes (PHAROS) system—an automated system within our electronic health record (EHR) to deliver provider‐specific patient outcome feedback.MethodsPHAROS includes: (1) individualized lists of patients seen and brief summaries of each case, (2) flags for important posthandoff events, and (3) links to charts to facilitate review. Starting June 2020, we coupled PHAROS with a resident educational session and individualized emails every 2 weeks outlining patients seen, number of posthandoff events, and instructions on how to access the PHAROS system.ResultsFrom July 2017 through April 2022, we measured the proportion of handoffs followed by reaccessing patients’ charts between 2 and 14 days posthandoff—a proxy for following up on the patient's outcomes. We performed an interrupted time series analysis on this outcome to determine if PHAROS was associated with a significant change in the trend of our outcome over time. Our secondary outcome was the number of times PHAROS was viewed each month. Our primary outcome had a significant increase in the slope over time (+0.13%/month, p = 0.03) after the introduction of the personalized reports and a nonsignificant change (−1.6%, p = 0.07) at the time of the intervention. The median (IQR) number of views of PHAROS per month was 33.2 (23.75–38.75).ConclusionsThe PHAROS system was associated with a significant increase in the rate of posthandoff chart reaccess among EM residents over time. The PHAROS project demonstrated the feasibility of harnessing the capabilities of the EHR to create an automated system to support EM trainee feedback of patient outcomes—a key component of diagnostic calibration and learning.

Funder

Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Reference10 articles.

1. Does outcome feedback make you a better emergency physician? A systematic review and research framework proposal

2. The Feedback Sanction

3. “I never hear what happens, even if they die”: a survey of emergency physicians about outcome feedback

4. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Emergency Medicine.Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.2023. Accessed May 31 2024.https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/110_emergencymedicine_2023.pdf

5. Postcare follow‐up in emergency medicine residencies;Adams WH;Ann Emerg Med,1992

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3