Energy dependence of x‐ray beam size produced by polycapillary x‐ray optics

Author:

Das Anusheela1ORCID,Heirwegh Chris M.1ORCID,Gao Ning2,Elam William T.3,Wade Lawrence A.1,Clark Benton C.4,Hurowitz Joel A.5,VanBommel Scott J.6,Jones Michael W. M.789,Allwood Abigail C.1

Affiliation:

1. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Pasadena California USA

2. X‐Ray Optical Systems (XOS), Inc. Albany New York USA

3. Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

4. Space Science Institute Boulder Colorado USA

5. Department of Geosciences, Stony Brook University Stony Brook New York USA

6. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis Missouri USA

7. Central Analytical Research Facility, Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Queensland Australia

8. School of Chemistry and Physics, Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Queensland Australia

9. Center for Planetary Surface Exploration, Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Queensland Australia

Abstract

AbstractIn this work, we studied the x‐ray energy dependence of x‐ray beam diameter focused by polycapillary optics. A quantitative beam diameter–energy relation enables more accurate estimation of the element‐specific interrogation area of a sample using the compositional maps produced by a micro‐XRF system. This improves upon our ability to visualize individual beam‐diameter sized mineral grains and in turn directly benefits Planetary Instrument for X‐ray Lithochemistry (PIXL) analyses of martian soil in addition to benefitting other micro‐focused x‐ray fluorescence (XRF) systems. The spatial distribution of an array of characteristic XRF emission lines was measured by sampling via a knife‐edge approach with small motor stepping of the beam across target edges. Data taken as part of this effort, from the Planetary Flight Model (PFM), were limited to only seven beam energies corresponding to the elements Ni, Cu, Se, Ta, Au, Ti and Ba. Hence, we conducted additional analysis using JPL's lab‐based breadboard (LBB) micro‐XRF system, a system that emulates PIXL's functionality where we measured beam diameter corresponding to 18 elements: Na, Mg, Al, Si, Cl, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, Se, Sr and Mo. The experimental results were also compared with Monte Carlo simulations. The beam diameter (y)–energy (x) relation that we obtained for LBB was y = 185.79 exp(−0.078x) whose exponential component was then used to get a more accurate relation for the PFM even with the limited data set: y = 227.53 exp(−0.078x). The difference in the two coefficients for the PFM and LBB stems mainly from the difference in the polycapillary optic design, and this work establishes x‐ray beam diameter versus energy relation quantitatively for both the systems.

Funder

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3