Comparison of genetic testing documentation between genetic counselors and non‐genetic counselors

Author:

Feldman Jessica123ORCID,Bhimarao Nagaraj Chinmayee1,Collins Kathleen1,Wakefield Emily1,He Hua1,Myers Melanie2,Wusik Katie1

Affiliation:

1. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) Cincinnati Ohio USA

2. College of Medicine University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA

3. Multicare Regional Maternal Fetal Medicine Auburn WA USA

Abstract

AbstractImplementation of genetic testing in healthcare increases, but access to, and number of, genetics providers remain scarce. This study analyzed the impact of genetic counselor (GC) involvement on frequency of documentation of pre‐ and post‐test counseling of genetic testing between GCs and genetics providers (GPs), and GCs and non‐genetics providers (NGPs). A retrospective chart review of 467 charts from patients who had genetic testing ordered between July 2016 and June 2018 at a primarily pediatric institution was conducted. GCs were involved for 223 charts (GC group), and not involved for 244 (non‐GC group). The non‐GC group was further stratified into patient charts with Genetics Providers (GP group) (n = 100) involved and those with Non‐Genetics Providers (NGP group) (n = 144) involved. Categorical, binomial, pre‐test variables (counseling, test description, results possibilities, insurance coverage, and cost) and categorical, binomial, post‐test variables (results disclosure, family testing recommendations, recurrence risk, and provided resources) were collected and compared using Fisher's exact test (p < 0.005). With the exception of test description, documentation for all variables occurred more frequently in the GC group compared to the NGP group (all p < 0.001). Documentation for the majority of variables also occurred more frequently in the GC group compared to the GP group (p < 0.005), with the exceptions of overall pre‐test counseling and family testing recommendations. GC involvement was associated with increased documentation of most pre‐ and post‐test genetic counseling variables. With increased emphasis placed on transparency, accurateness, and access for patients of the EMR, in part due to the passage of the CARES Act, documentation should reflect the content of counseling provided. The cause of the documentation discrepancy identified may have differing effects on patient care and provider education.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics (clinical)

Reference59 articles.

1. ACGC. (2019).Practice Based Competencies for Genetic Counselors. Retrieved fromhttps://www.gceducation.org/wp‐content/uploads/2019/06/ACGC‐Core‐Competencies‐Brochure_15_Web_REV‐6‐2019.pdf

2. ACGME. (2018).Common Program Requirements. Retrieved fromhttps://www.acgme.org/what‐we‐do/accreditation/common‐program‐requirements/

3. Novel genetic testing model: A collaboration between genetic counselors and nephrology

4. The role of electronic medical records in improving the quality of health care services: Comparative study

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pathologist Pediatric In-Patient Genetic Stewardship;Fetal and Pediatric Pathology;2023-10-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3