Affiliation:
1. Department of Ophthalmology, Flaum Eye Institute and Center for Visual Science University of Rochester Rochester New York USA
2. Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology University of Rochester Rochester New York USA
3. Bascom Palmer Eye Institute University of Miami Miami Florida USA
4. Scheie Eye Institute University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
Abstract
Background/objectivesStroke damage to the primary visual cortex induces large, homonymous visual field defects that impair daily living. Here, we asked if vision‐related quality of life (VR‐QoL) is impacted by time since stroke.Subjects/methodsWe conducted a retrospective meta‐analysis of 95 occipital stroke patients (female/male = 26/69, 27–78 years old, 0.5–373.5 months poststroke) in whom VR‐QoL was estimated using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI‐VFQ) and its 10‐item neuro‐ophthalmic supplement (Neuro10). Visual deficit severity was represented by the perimetric mean deviation (PMD) calculated from 24‐2 Humphrey visual fields. Data were compared with published cohorts of visually intact controls. The relationship between VR‐QoL and time poststroke was assessed across participants, adjusting for deficit severity and age with a multiple linear regression analysis.ResultsOccipital stroke patients had significantly lower NEI‐VFQ and Neuro10 composite scores than controls. All subscale scores describing specific aspects of visual ability and functioning were impaired except for ocular pain and general health, which did not differ significantly from controls. Surprisingly, visual deficit severity was not correlated with either composite score, both of which increased with time poststroke, even when adjusting for PMD and age.ConclusionsVR‐QoL appears to improve with time postoccipital stroke, irrespective of visual deficit size or patient age at insult. This may reflect the natural development of compensatory strategies and lifestyle adjustments. Thus, future studies examining the impact of rehabilitation on daily living in this patient population should consider the possibility that their VR‐QoL may change gradually over time, even without therapeutic intervention.