Small field output correction factors at 18 MV

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe response of various detectors in the radiotherapy energy range has been investigated, especially for 6 and 10 MV energies for small fields, and is summarized in TRS‐483. However, data for accelerator energies above 10 MV are sparse or unavailable for many detectors, especially for the energy of 18 MV. Small variations in field output factors for the commissioning of a treatment planning system can have a high impact on calculation of dose distributions.PurposeMany studies describe an energy dependence of the response for a large number of detectors. We wanted to close the gap for the 18 MV energy regime and determined field output correction factors for different detectors at 18 MV.MethodsAn ELEKTA Versa HD accelerator at 18 MV was used together with a PTW MP3 water phantom at an SSD of 90 cm. The following detectors were examined: PTW Semiflex 31021, PinPoint 3D 31022, diode 60012, diode 60008 and microDiamond 60019, Sun Nuclear EDGE detector, IBA PFD, SFD, Razor Chamber, Razor Nano Chamber and Razor Diode, Standard Imaging Scintillator Exradin W2 1x3, W2 1x1 and Gafchromic EBT3 film. The dose response was determined at a depth of 10 cm for square fields between 0.5 and 10 cm side length. As reference data a composure of radiochromic film data for small fields ( cm) and data of all compatible chambers for larger fields ( cm) was used. The effective field sizes of small fields were determined from profiles obtained on radiochromic film. The obtained field output correction factors obey the rules of the TRS‐483 protocol.ResultsThe W2 1x1 scintillator and the Razor Chamber showed the smallest deviations from the reference curve. The shielded diodes (diode 60008, EDGE detector) showed the highest over‐response at small fields, followed by PFD, microDiamond and the unshielded diodes (diode 60012, SFD). The ionization chambers exhibited the well‐known volume effect, that is, strong under‐response at small fields of up to 9% for the PinPoint 3D, 7% for the Razor Chamber and up to 30% for the Semiflex detector for the smallest studied field size. The small chambers showed a polarity effect in axial orientation, especially the Razor Nano Chamber. Corrections at 18 MV are generally larger than those provided by TRS‐483, continuing the trend of increasing corrections between 6 and 10 MV also at a higher accelerator energy. Only the PinPoint 3D Chamber showed a slightly smaller correction.ConclusionsField output correction factors were determined for square field sizes between 0.5 and 10 cm at 18 MV. Most detectors needed a larger correction than at 6 and 10 MV. Thus, the use of correction factors will improve beam data for 18 MV.