Where is the wolf? A multi‐method comparison of social values and perceptions in a Swiss park

Author:

Cracco Marina12ORCID,Michel Annina H.34,Komossa Franziska3,Kong Inhye3,Backhaus Norman34,Thaler Lucia3,Oliveri Timo5,Walters Gretchen12

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Geography and Sustainability, University of Lausanne Switzerland

2. Interdisciplinary Center for Mountain Research, University of Lausanne Switzerland

3. Department of Geography, University of Zurich Switzerland

4. University Research Priority Program ‘Global Change and Biodiversity', University of Zurich Switzerland

5. Department of Interdisciplinary Work (IQT), University of Applied Sciences of Eastern Switzerland Switzerland

Abstract

This article presents our recent experience studying public perceptions, discourses, and social values in Park Beverin, a Regional Nature Park in Switzerland. We applied four social research methods (news media analysis, survey with micro‐narratives, go‐along interviews, and focus groups), and delved into the subject of wolf Canis lupus adapting a triangulation protocol and systematic process from the health sciences. We observed the recurring perceptions of ‘wolf' throughout three of the four methods; however, depictions, values, prominence, and presence varied by method. Social values of the wolf were mostly silent when compared to other topics, and ‘wolf amplification' and ‘wolf fatigue' point to the need to rethink the social aspects in wolf management, conservation, and policy. The findings also show the need for diverse research methods for revealing social values and perceptions on sensitive topics that otherwise the use of one method may be masking or amplifying.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference148 articles.

1. Silence as Gesture: Rethinking the Nature of Communicative Silences

2. Wölfe im Kanton Graubünden 2019: erfahrungen des Amtes für Jagd und Fischerei (AJF) im Jahre 2019 2020

3. Quartalsbericht Grossraubtiere 2022

4. Quartalsbericht Grossraubtiere 2023

5. Conceptualizing the diverse values of nature and their contributions to people. Chapter 2;Anderson C. B.;Methodological assessment report on the diverse values and valuation of nature of the intergovernmental science‐policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3