Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound of the Chest in Children and Adolescents

Abstract

ObjectivesTo determine the added diagnostic value of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in pediatric chest abnormalities by comparing interpretation of CEUS studies and confidence level to conventional US studies.MethodsCEUS studies in patients with a variety of clinically suspected chest abnormalities performed between 2016 and 2020 were reviewed and compared to same‐day conventional US studies. Examinations were independently interpreted by 4 radiologists blinded to clinical and other imaging data. Rater confidence was classified as low, moderate, or high. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by comparing image interpretation to patient outcome as the ground truth. Interobserver agreement was also assessed.ResultsSixteen patients (10 male) with 18 CEUS studies were included. Median rater agreement with ground truth was significantly higher for CEUS (100%) than conventional US (50%; P = .004). Median rater confidence was high (3.0) for CEUS, and low‐moderate (1.5) for conventional US (P < .001). CEUS sensitivity (54.6–81.8%) and specificity (63.4–100.0%) were greater than conventional US (45.5–72.7% and 12.5–63.5%, respectively). CEUS false positives (0–4) and false negatives (2–5) were fewer than conventional US (4–7 and 3–6, respectively). Except for one rater pair where agreement was substantial (κ = .78, P < .01), inter‐rater agreement for CEUS for all other rater pairs was nonsignificant (κ = .25–0.51, P ≥ .07). Agreement for conventional US was moderate and statistically significant for 3 rater pairs (κ = .55–0.78) and nonsignificant for the remaining 3 rater pairs (P ≥ .06).ConclusionsCEUS adds diagnostic value to the assessment of a variety of chest abnormalities. The data support further evaluation of the role of CEUS as a non‐invasive, problem‐solving technique in children.