Concurrent immunotherapy and re‐irradiation utilizing stereotactic body radiotherapy for recurrent high‐grade gliomas

Author:

Mahase Sean S.12ORCID,Roytman Michelle3,Roth O'Brien Diana1,Ivanidze Jana3,Schwartz Theodore H.4,Pannullo Susan C.4,Ramakrishna Rohan4,Magge Rajiv S.5,Williams Nicholas6,Fine Howard A.5,Chiang Gloria Chia‐Yi3,Knisely Jonathan P. S.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiation Oncology NewYork Presbyterian–Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA

2. Department of Radiation Oncology Penn State Cancer Institute Hershey Pennsylvania USA

3. Department of Radiology NewYork Presbyterian–Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA

4. Department of Neurosurgery NewYork Presbyterian–Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA

5. Department of Neurology NewYork Presbyterian–Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA

6. Department of Healthcare Policy & Research, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundClinical trials evaluating immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in recurrent high‐grade gliomas (rHGG) report 7%–20% 6‐month progression‐free survival (PFS), while re‐irradiation demonstrates 28%–39% 6‐month PFS.AimsWe evaluate outcomes of patients treated with ICI and concurrent re‐irradiation utilizing stereotactic body radiotherapy/fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SBRT) compared to ICI monotherapy.Methods and ResultsPatients ≥18‐years‐old with rHGG (WHO grade III and IV) receiving ICI + SBRT or ICI monotherapy between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2019 were included. Adverse events, 6‐month PFS and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Log‐rank tests were used to evaluate PFS and OS. Histogram analyses of apparent diffusion coefficient maps and dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance perfusion metrics were performed. Twenty‐one patients with rHGG (ICI + SBRT: 16; ICI: 5) were included. The ICI + SBRT and ICI groups received a mean 7.25 and 6.2 ICI cycles, respectively. There were five grade 1, one grade 2 and no grade 3–5 AEs in the ICI + SBRT group, and four grade 1 and no grade 2–5 AEs in the ICI group. Median PFS was 2.85 and 1 month for the ICI + SBRT and ICI groups; median OS was 7 and 6 months among ICI + SBRT and ICI groups, respectively. There were significant differences in pre and posttreatment tumor volume in the cohort (12.35 vs. 20.51; p = .03), but not between treatment groups.ConclusionsIn this heavily pretreated cohort, ICI with re‐irradiation utilizing SBRT was well tolerated. Prospective studies are warranted to evaluate potential therapeutic benefits to re‐irradiation with ICI + SBRT in rHGG.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3