Effects of two common antibiotics on the skin microbiome of ornamental reef fishes: Implications for manipulative experiments in microbial dynamics

Author:

Pereira Ana123,Brown Anya45,Strobel Davis6,Soares Marta C.137,Xavier Raquel13ORCID,Apprill Amy4,Sikkel Paul89

Affiliation:

1. CIBIO, Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources – InBIO Associate Laboratory, Vairão Campus University of Porto Vairão Portugal

2. Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences University do Porto Porto Portugal

3. BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO Vairão Portugal

4. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole Massachusetts USA

5. University of California, Davis, Bodega Marine Lab Bodega Bay California USA

6. Center for Marine and Environmental Studies University of the Virgin Islands St. Thomas Virgin Islands (U.S.)

7. MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre/ARNET – Aquatic Research Network, Institute for Research and Advanced Training (IIFA) Universidade de Évora Évora Portugal

8. Department of Marine Biology and Ecology, Rosenstiel School of Marine Atmospheric, and Earth Science, University of Miami Miami Florida USA

9. Water Research Group, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management North‐West University Potchefstroom South Africa

Abstract

AbstractAn understanding of the mechanistic drivers of animal‐microbial symbiosis and associations generally requires experiments that manipulate specific symbionts or microbial communities. As part of an ongoing study of the mechanisms that drive microbial communities in coral reef fishes, and specifically the role of cleanerfish in microbial transmission, we tested the effects of the commonly used antibiotics Enrofloxacin and Nitrofurazone on the skin microbiome of three ornamental reef fish species: the four‐eyed butterflyfish, Chaetodon capistratus (Chaetodontidae), the cleanerfish neon goby Elacatinus oceanops (Gobiidae) and the beaugregory damselfish Stegastes leucostictus (Pomacentridae). Our main aim was to characterize dysbiosis prompted by the delivery of the two antibiotics and understand whether both could be used to establish good starting points for microbial transmission experiments. We bathed the fish in antibiotic (or no exposure in the controls), sampled the skin microbiota via swabbing at zero (before treatment) and 3 and 7 days during the treatments, and examined the microbial community using a 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach. Nitrofurazone reduced skin‐associated microbial diversity in all species, whereas the same effect for Enrofloxacin was only seen in S. leucostictus. Although each antibiotic had its own, unique impact in microbial community, all treatments showed positive and negative shifts in the most abundant microbial taxa over time. Moreover, soon after the delivery of both antibiotics, increases in the abundance of opportunistic bacteria or potential pathogens, such as Alteromonas and Vibrio, were observed. Although both antibiotics are effective, Nitrofurazone more successfully reduces microbial diversity and therefore may be more ideal for experiments seeking to disrupt fish microbiomes.

Funder

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3