Cervical biopsy-based comparison of a new liquid-based thin-layer preparation with conventional Pap smears-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Cervical biopsy-based comparison of a new liquid-based thin-layer preparation with conventional Pap smears

Published:2004-03-23 Issue:4 Volume:30 Page:220-226
ISSN:8755-1039
Container-title:Diagnostic Cytopathology
language:en
Short-container-title:Diagn. Cytopathol.

Author:

Mattosinho de Castro Ferraz Maria da Gloria,Nicolau Sérgio Mancini,Stávale João Norberto,Focchi José,Castelo Adauto,Dôres Gerson Botacini,Mielzynska-Lohnas Iwona,Lorincz Attila,Rodrigues de Lima Geraldo

Funder

Digene Corp.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,Histology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. Estimates of the worldwide incidence of eighteen major cancers in 1985;Parkin;Int J Cancer,1993

2. Invasive cervical cancer rising in young white females;Larsen;J Natl Cancer Inst,1994

3. An epidemiologic study of Pap screening histories in women with invasive carcinomas of the uterine cervix;Nasca;NY State J Med,1991

4. The screening histories of women with invasive cervical cancer, Connecticut;Janerich;Am J Publ Health,1995

5. The cytologic history of 245 patients developing invasive cervical carcinoma;Carmichael;Am J Obstet Gynecol,1984

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Biomarkers in the Screening and Management of Cervical Cancer;Journal of Colposcopy and Lower Genital Tract Pathology;2024-01

2. Circulating cervical cancer biomarkers potentially useful in medical attention (Review);Molecular and Clinical Oncology;2023-01-18

3. Is liquid-based cervical cytology test more effective than conventional pap smear?;Electronic Journal of General Medicine;2017-01-05

4. Comparative study of the results from conventional cervico-vaginal oncotic cytology and liquid-based cytology;Einstein (São Paulo);2012-12

5. Relative Accuracy of Cervical and Anal Cytology for Detection of High Grade Lesions by Colposcope Guided Biopsy: A Cut-Point Meta-Analytic Comparison;PLoS ONE;2012-07-25