Improving criteria for dissemination in space in multiple sclerosis by including additional regions

Author:

Foster Michael A.1ORCID,Pontillo Giuseppe123,Davagnanam Indran4,Collorone Sara1ORCID,Prados Ferran156,Kanber Baris15ORCID,Yiannakas Marios C.1,Ogunbowale Lola7,Burke Ailbhe7,Gandini Wheeler‐Kingshott Claudia A. M.18,Ciccarelli Olga19,Brownlee Wallace19ORCID,Barkhof Frederik12459,Toosy Ahmed T.1

Affiliation:

1. Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences University College London London UK

2. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands

3. Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences and Electrical Engineering and Information Technology University of Naples Federico II Naples Italy

4. Department of Brain Repair & Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences University College London London UK

5. Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Science University College London London UK

6. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya Barcelona Spain

7. Strabismus and Neuro‐Ophthalmology Service Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London UK

8. Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences University of Pavia Pavia Italy

9. NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre London UK

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveWe investigated the effects of adding regions to current dissemination in space (DIS) criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS).MethodsParticipants underwent brain, optic nerve, and spinal cord MRI. Baseline DIS was assessed by 2017 McDonald criteria and versions including optic nerve, temporal lobe, or corpus callosum as a fifth region (requiring 2/5), a version with all regions (requiring 3/7) and optic nerve variations requiring 3/5 and 4/5 regions. Performance was evaluated against MS diagnosis (2017 McDonald criteria) during follow‐up.ResultsEighty‐four participants were recruited (53F, 32.8 ± 7.1 years). 2017 McDonald DIS criteria were 87% sensitive (95% CI: 76–94), 73% specific (50–89), and 83% accurate (74–91) in identifying MS. Modified criteria with optic nerve improved sensitivity to 98% (91–100), with specificity 33% (13–59) and accuracy 84% (74–91). Criteria including temporal lobe showed sensitivity 94% (84–98), specificity 50% (28–72), and accuracy 82% (72–90); criteria including corpus callosum showed sensitivity 90% (80–96), specificity 68% (45–86), and accuracy 85% (75–91). Criteria adding all three regions (3/7 required) had sensitivity 95% (87–99), specificity 55% (32–76), and accuracy 85% (75–91). When requiring 3/5 regions (optic nerve as the fifth), sensitivity was 82% (70–91), specificity 77% (55–92), and accuracy 81% (71–89); with 4/5 regions, sensitivity was 56% (43–69), specificity 95% (77–100), and accuracy 67% (56–77).InterpretationOptic nerve inclusion increased sensitivity while lowering specificity. Increasing required regions in optic nerve criteria increased specificity and decreased sensitivity. Results suggest considering the optic nerve for DIS. An option of 3/5 or 4/5 regions preserved specificity, and criteria adding all three regions had highest accuracy.

Funder

Wings for Life

Global Challenges Research Fund

European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis

Ataxia UK

Medical Research Council

Multiple Sclerosis Society

Rosetrees Trust

UCLH Biomedical Research Centre

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3