The effect of increasing motor end‐plate innervation on smile activation in acute and early facial palsy

Abstract

AbstractWhile it has been over half a century since primary cross‐facial nerve grafting was first described for facial reanimation, the outcome of this procedure, remains inconsistent and provide lesser smile excursion when compared to the likes of the masseteric nerve. However, the latter itself has limitations in terms of the lack of spontaneity and resting tone. While combinations have been attempted more proximally, we ask the question as to whether more distal nerve transfers with vascularized nerve grafts are a better option. In a retrospective review of clinical practice at our institute, 16 consecutive patients had single, double, and finally triple distal nerve transfers, close to the target facial muscle to reinnervate the motor endplates directly, over a 6‐year period (2018–23). All patients had the onset of facial palsy within 18 months. Statistical analysis of the comparison between three sub‐cohorts was performed using student's t‐test and one‐way ANOVA, respectively. Qualitatively, masseteric neurotization of a single facial nerve branch translated into smile improvement in 50% of cases, as opposed to all cases of double‐ and triple‐neurotization of the smile muscles. In terms of upper lip elevation, single neurotization showed improvement in 25% of cases, double‐neurotization in 40% of cases and triple‐neurotization in 100% of cases. Upper lip elevation was also significantly better in those who had a vascularized cross‐facial nerve graft (Student's t‐test <0.05). In summary, increasing neural input to the motor endplates of smile muscles can significantly improve smile activation, in acute flaccid facial palsies.