Comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to reduce access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: The angio-seal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome trial-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to reduce access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: The angio-seal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome trial

Published:2016-08-12 Issue:6 Volume:89 Page:976-982
ISSN:1522-1946
Container-title:Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
language:en
Short-container-title:Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent.

Author:

Andrade Pedro B.¹²,Mattos Luiz A.³,Rinaldi Fábio S.¹,Bienert Igor C.¹²,Barbosa Robson A.¹,Labrunie André¹⁴,Tebet Marden³,Esteves Vinícius³,Abizaid Alexandre⁵,Sousa Amanda R.⁵

Affiliation:

1. Invasive Cardiology, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Marília; São Paulo Brazil

2. Invasive Cardiology, Faculdade Estadual de Medicina de Marília - FAMEMA; São Paulo Brazil

3. Invasive Cardiology, Rede D'or São Luiz; São Paulo Brazil

4. Invasive Cardiology, Hospital do Coração de Londrina; Paraná Brazil

5. Invasive Cardiology, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia; São Paulo Brazil

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. Association between bleeding events and in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention;Chhatriwalla;Jama,2013

2. Incidence and correlates of major bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention across different clinical presentations;Loh;Am Heart J,2014

3. Blood transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention and risk of subsequent adverse outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis;Kwok;J Am Coll Cardiol Intv,2015

4. Access and non-access site bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention and risk of subsequent mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events: Systematic review and meta-analysis;Kwok;Circ Cardiovasc Interv,2015

5. Comparison of transradial and femoral approaches for percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis;Bertrand;Am Heart J,2012

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Impact of radial compression protocols on radial artery occlusion and hemostasis time in coronary angiography;Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics;2022-12-07

2. Femoral Artery Closure Devices vs Manual Compression During Cardiac Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention;Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions;2022-09

3. Radial artery access for peripheral endovascular procedures;Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery;2022-01

4. Radial Access for Coronary Angiography Carries Fewer Complications Compared with Femoral Access: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2021-05-17

5. Radial versus femoral access for coronary interventions: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized trials;Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions;2021-01-28