The Delaware‐Oslo ACL Cohort treatment algorithm yields superior outcomes to usual care 9–12 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Author:

Urhausen Anouk P.1ORCID,Grindem Hege2ORCID,Engebretsen Lars23ORCID,Grävare Silbernagel Karin4ORCID,Axe Michael J.45ORCID,Snyder‐Mackler Lynn4ORCID,Risberg May Arna13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sports Medicine Norwegian School of Sport Sciences Oslo Norway

2. Oslo Sport Trauma Research Center Norwegian School of Sport Sciences Oslo Norway

3. Division of Orthopedic Surgery Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway

4. Department of Physical Therapy University of Delaware Newark Delaware USA

5. First State Orthopaedics Newark Delaware USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposePatient‐reported outcomes were compared between participants who followed the treatment algorithm of the Delaware‐Oslo ACL Cohort, consisting of progressive preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, patient education, clinical testing and shared decision‐making about treatment choice, and those who followed usual care 9–12 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).MethodsParticipants with primary ACLR were included from the Norwegian arm of the Delaware‐Oslo ACL Cohort and the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry (usual care). The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscale scores and the International Knee Documentation Committee‐Subjective Knee Form (IKDC‐SKF) scores were compared. KOOS scores for the usual care group were converted to IKDC‐SKF scores with recently published validated crosswalk. The percentages of participants with scores above predefined thresholds for patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) were also calculated.ResultsEighty of 100 (80%) participants from the Delaware‐Oslo ACL Cohort and 1588 of 3248 (49%) from the usual care group participated in the follow‐up. Participants from the Delaware‐Oslo ACL Cohort had higher KOOS subscale (p < 0.001) and IKDC‐SKF scores (p < 0.001), and a higher percentage reached PASS (84%–96% vs. 62%–76%, p ≤ 0.002) for KOOS Pain, symptoms, activities of daily living and sports compared to the usual care group. No significant differences were found for KOOS quality of life scores (not significant [n.s.]) or PASS percentages (80% vs. 74%, n.s.).ConclusionParticipants with ACLR who followed the Delaware‐Oslo ACL Cohort treatment algorithm had reduced knee symptoms, superior function and higher percentages of satisfactory outcomes than participants who followed usual care.Level of EvidenceLevel II.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3