Improving MR axon radius estimation in human white matter using spiral acquisition and field monitoring

Author:

Veldmann Marten1ORCID,Edwards Luke J.2ORCID,Pine Kerrin J.2ORCID,Ehses Philipp1ORCID,Ferreira Mónica34ORCID,Weiskopf Nikolaus256ORCID,Stoecker Tony17ORCID

Affiliation:

1. MR Physics German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) e.V Bonn Germany

2. Department of Neurophysics Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig Germany

3. Clinical Research German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) e.V Bonn Germany

4. University of Bonn Bonn Germany

5. Felix Bloch Institute for Solid State Physics, Faculty of Physics and Earth System Sciences Leipzig University Leipzig Germany

6. Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology University College London London UK

7. Department of Physics & Astronomy University of Bonn Bonn Germany

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo compare MR axon radius estimation in human white matter using a multiband spiral sequence combined with field monitoring to the current state‐of‐the‐art echo‐planar imaging (EPI)‐based approach.MethodsA custom multiband spiral sequence was used for diffusion‐weighted imaging at ultra‐high ‐values. Field monitoring and higher order image reconstruction were employed to greatly reduce artifacts in spiral images. Diffusion weighting parameters were chosen to match a state‐of‐the art EPI‐based axon radius mapping protocol. The spiral approach was compared to the EPI approach by comparing the image signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and performing a test–retest study to assess the respective variability and repeatability of axon radius mapping. Effective axon radius estimates were compared over white matter voxels and along the left corticospinal tract.ResultsIncreased SNR and reduced artifacts in spiral images led to reduced variability in resulting axon radius maps, especially in low‐SNR regions. Test–retest variability was reduced by a factor of approximately 1.5 using the spiral approach. Reduced repeatability due to significant bias was found for some subjects in both spiral and EPI approaches, and attributed to scanner instability, pointing to a previously unknown limitation of the state‐of‐the‐art approach.ConclusionCombining spiral readouts with field monitoring improved mapping of the effective axon radius compared to the conventional EPI approach.

Funder

Seventh Framework Programme

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3