Barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in community oncology practices

Author:

Mullins Megan A.12ORCID,Reber Lisa1,Washington Ariel3,Stasenko Marina4,Rankin Aaron5ORCID,Friese Christopher R.67ORCID,Cooley Mary E.8,Hudson Matthew F.9,Wallner Lauren P.57ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA

2. Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA

3. Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit Michigan USA

4. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology NYU Langone Health New York New York USA

5. Department of Internal Medicine University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

6. Center for Improving Patient and Population Health University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

7. Rogel Cancer Center University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

8. Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA

9. Prisma Health Cancer Institute Greenville South Carolina Greenville South Carolina USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data collection in community oncology practices is critical to identify and address cancer inequities, but less than 20% of NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP)‐affiliated practices regularly collect SOGI data despite widespread recommendations. We evaluated multilevel barriers and facilitators for SOGI data collection at NCORP practices.MethodsWe conducted 14 semi‐structured interviews at seven purposefully sampled NCORP oncology practices. We interviewed one clinician (oncologist, advanced practice provider) and one clinic staff member per practice. Thematic analysis informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was conducted to identify barriers and facilitators.ResultsThematic saturation occurred after interviews at six practices and was confirmed with interviews at an additional practice. Participants highlighted multilevel barriers including low levels of understanding, information technology infrastructure, and perceived low relative priority. Not understanding the role of SOGI data in oncology care contributed to cis‐heteronormative culture. At the clinic level, this culture coincided with a lack of processes and policies for collecting SOGI from all patients. At the care team level, perceived irrelevance to oncology care was related to discomfort asking SOGI, fear of patient discomfort, and limited awareness of SOGI in electronic health records. Suggested solutions included: normalizing asking SOGI questions, giving patients privacy to complete SOGI, and clarifying clinical relevance.ConclusionsSOGI data collection barriers stemmed from perceptions that SOGI disclosure does not influence care quality. Oncology teams may benefit from training on culturally sensitive SOGI collection, education on SOGI data relevance to oncology practices, and support for implementing SOGI data collection policies.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3