Mental state at time of offense in the hot tub: An empirical examination of concurrent expert testimony in an insanity case-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Mental state at time of offense in the hot tub: An empirical examination of concurrent expert testimony in an insanity case

Published:2018-04-24 Issue:3 Volume:36 Page:358-372
ISSN:0735-3936
Container-title:Behavioral Sciences & the Law
language:en
Short-container-title:Behav Sci Law

Author:

Krauss Daniel A.¹,Gongola Jennifer²,Scurich Nicholas²,Busch Brendan¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology; Claremont McKenna College; Claremont CA USA

2. Department of Psychology and Social Behavior and Department of Criminology, Law, & Society; University of California-Irvine; Irvine CA USA

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Law,Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology

Reference41 articles.

1. Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 1985

2. Cross-examination educates jurors about missing control groups in scientific evidence;Austin;Psychology, Public Policy, and Law,2015

3. Of juries and court-appointed experts: The impact of nonadversarial expert testimony;Brekke;Law and Human Behavior,1991

4. Butt , A. 2017 Concurrent Expert Evidence in U.S. Toxic Harms Cases and Civil Cases More Generally: Is There a Proper Role For “Hot Tubbing”? http://civiljuryproject.law.nyu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Toxic-Harms-Paper-AEB-NYU_Publish-bluebook3.pdf

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Black Robes and White Coats: Daubert Standard and Medical and Legal Considerations for Medical Expert Witnesses;Cureus;2024-09-13

2. Revisiting Daubert: Judicial Gatekeeping and Expert Ethics in Court;Psychological Injury and Law;2021-10-21

3. Testing the waters: An investigation of the impact of hot tubbing on experts from referral through testimony.;Law and Human Behavior;2021-06

4. Introduction to this Special Issue: The characteristics of insanity and the insanity evaluation process;Behavioral Sciences & the Law;2018-04-25