More than meets the eye: Augmented reality in surgical oncology

Author:

Prasad Kavita1ORCID,Fassler Carly2,Miller Alexis3,Aweeda Marina2,Pruthi Sumit4,Fusco Joseph C.5,Daniel Bruce6,Miga Michael7,Wu Jie Ying8,Topf Michael C.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck Surgery Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA

2. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck Surgery Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA

3. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck Surgery University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA

4. Department of Radiology Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA

5. Department of Pediatric Surgery Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA

6. Department of Radiology Stanford Health Care Palo Alto California USA

7. Department of Biomedical Engineering Vanderbilt University Nashville Tennessee USA

8. Department of Computer Science Vanderbilt University Nashville Tennessee USA

Abstract

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesIn the field of surgical oncology, there has been a desire for innovative techniques to improve tumor visualization, resection, and patient outcomes. Augmented reality (AR) technology superimposes digital content onto the real‐world environment, enhancing the user's experience by blending digital and physical elements. A thorough examination of AR technology in surgical oncology has yet to be performed.MethodsA scoping review of intraoperative AR in surgical oncology was conducted according to the guidelines and recommendations of The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐analyzes Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA‐ScR) framework. All original articles examining the use of intraoperative AR during surgical management of cancer were included. Exclusion criteria included virtual reality applications only, preoperative use only, fluorescence, AR not specific to surgical oncology, and study design (reviews, commentaries, abstracts).ResultsA total of 2735 articles were identified of which 83 were included. Most studies (52) were performed on animals or phantom models, while the remaining included patients. A total of 1112 intraoperative AR surgical cases were performed across the studies. The most common anatomic site was brain (20 articles), followed by liver (16), renal (9), and head and neck (8). AR was most often used for intraoperative navigation or anatomic visualization of tumors or critical structures but was also used to identify osteotomy or craniotomy planes.ConclusionsAR technology has been applied across the field of surgical oncology to aid in localization and resection of tumors.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3