Affiliation:
1. Department of Radiology The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou 510000 People's Republic of China
2. Guangzhou Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou 510000 People's Republic of China
3. Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou 510000 People's Republic of China
4. Department of Radiology Sun Yat‐Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat‐Sen University Guangzhou 510120 People's Republic of China
Abstract
BackgroundDiagnostic performance of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) by prenatal MRI is unsatisfactory. Deep learning radiomics (DLR) has the potential to quantify the MRI features of PAS.PurposeTo explore whether DLR from MRI can be used to identify pregnancies with PAS.Study TypeRetrospective.Population324 pregnant women (mean age, 33.3 years) suspected PAS (170 training and 72 validation from institution 1, 82 external validation from institution 2) with clinicopathologically proved PAS (206 PAS, 118 non‐PAS).Field Strength/Sequence3‐T, turbo spin‐echo T2‐weighted images.AssessmentThe DLR features were extracted using the MedicalNet. An MRI‐based DLR model incorporating DLR signature, clinical model (different clinical characteristics between PAS and non‐PAS groups), and MRI morphologic model (radiologists' binary assessment for the PAS diagnosis) was developed. These models were constructed in the training dataset and then validated in the validation datasets.Statistical TestsThe Student t‐test or Mann–Whitney U, χ2 or Fisher exact test, Kappa, dice similarity coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficients, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression, multivariate logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, DeLong test, net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), calibration curve with Hosmer–Lemeshow test, decision curve analysis (DCA). P < 0.05 indicated a significant difference.ResultsThe MRI‐based DLR model had a higher area under the curve than the clinical model in three datasets (0.880 vs. 0.741, 0.861 vs. 0.772, 0.852 vs. 0.675, respectively) or MRI morphologic model in training and independent validation datasets (0.880 vs. 0.760, 0.861, vs. 0.781, respectively). The NRI and IDI were 0.123 and 0.104, respectively. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test had nonsignificant statistics (P = 0.296 to 0.590). The DCA offered a net benefit at any threshold probability.Data ConclusionAn MRI‐based DLR model may show better performance in diagnosing PAS than a clinical or MRI morphologic model.Level of Evidence3Technical Efficacy Stage2
Funder
Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献