Big Question to Developing Solutions: A Decade of Progress in the Development of Aquatic New Approach Methodologies from 2012 to 2022

Author:

Langan Laura M.1ORCID,Paparella Martin2,Burden Natalie3,Constantine Lisa4ORCID,Margiotta‐Casaluci Luigi5,Miller Thomas H.6,Moe S. Jannicke7ORCID,Owen Stewart F.8,Schaffert Alexandra2ORCID,Sikanen Tiina9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Environmental Science Baylor University Waco Texas USA

2. Department of Medical Biochemistry Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria

3. National Centre for the 3Rs (NC3Rs) London United Kingdom

4. Pfizer Worldwide R&D Groton Connecticut USA

5. Department of Analytical, Environmental and Forensic Sciences School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London London United Kingdom

6. Centre for Pollution Research & Policy Environmental Sciences, Brunel University London London United Kingdom

7. Section for Ecotoxicology and Risk Assessment Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA) Oslo Norway

8. AstraZeneca, Global Sustainability, Macclesfield Cheshire United Kingdom

9. Faculty of Pharmacy and Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland

Abstract

AbstractIn 2012, 20 key questions related to hazard and exposure assessment and environmental and health risks of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the natural environment were identified. A decade later, this article examines the current level of knowledge around one of the lowest‐ranking questions at that time, number 19: “Can nonanimal testing methods be developed that will provide equivalent or better hazard data compared with current in vivo methods?” The inclusion of alternative methods that replace, reduce, or refine animal testing within the regulatory context of risk and hazard assessment of chemicals generally faces many hurdles, although this varies both by organism (human‐centric vs. other), sector, and geographical region or country. Focusing on the past 10 years, only works that might reasonably be considered to contribute to advancements in the field of aquatic environmental risk assessment are highlighted. Particular attention is paid to methods of contemporary interest and importance, representing progress in (1) the development of methods which provide equivalent or better data compared with current in vivo methods such as bioaccumulation, (2) weight of evidence, or (3) ‐omic‐based applications. Evolution and convergence of these risk assessment areas offer the basis for fundamental frameshifts in how data are collated and used for the protection of taxa across the breadth of the aquatic environment. Looking to the future, we are at a tipping point, with a need for a global and inclusive approach to establish consensus. Bringing together these methods (both new and old) for regulatory assessment and decision‐making will require a concerted effort and orchestration. Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;00:1–15. © 2023 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Environmental Chemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3