Conservation decision makers worry about relevancy and funding but not climate change

Author:

Jewell Kathryn1ORCID,Peterson M. Nils1,Martin Mallory2,Stevenson Kathryn T.3,Terando Adam45,Teseneer Rachel1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Forestry and Envrionmental Resources North Carolina, State University 2820 Faucette Drive Raleigh NC 27695 USA

2. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Science Applications 1751 Varsity Drive Raleigh NC 27699 USA

3. Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management North Carolina State University 2820 Faucette Drive Raleigh NC 27695 USA

4. U.S. Geological Survey, Southeast Climate Adaptation Science Center North Carolina State University Campus Box 7617 Raleigh NC 27695 USA

5. Department of Applied Ecology North Carolina State University 2820 Faucette Drive Raleigh NC 27695 USA

Abstract

AbstractStakeholders fundamentally shape the success of wildlife management, yet little is known about how one of the most important stakeholder groups, wildlife agency decision makers, view emerging conservation challenges. Wildlife agency decision makers collectively shape how wildlife conservation unfolds in North America, but their perspectives are generally absent in the literature. Challenges including climate change, conservation funding models, and wildlife disease make understanding how wildlife decision makers view the future of wildlife conservation essential. We interviewed 48 directors and supervisory board members of wildlife agencies in the southeast United States from July 2019 to January 2020 to gauge their assessment of future conservation challenges and preferred response strategies. Declining agency relevancy and insufficient funding were the 2 most commonly identified challenges, while climate change was rarely mentioned as an issue because decision makers believed it was a relatively slow‐moving background condition. Decision makers described improving relevance through education and outreach as their primary response to conservation challenges. Our results suggest that climate change‐informed wildlife management may benefit from a 2‐pronged approach. First, we suggest decision makers should be informed about the challenges posed by climate change, and second, existing efforts to promote diversity among constituents should include engaging groups who support tackling the threat climate change poses to wildlife conservation. Increasing the priority given to climate change adaptation efforts in wildlife agencies will likely require future research to discern which approaches can most improve the perceived salience of climate change to decision makers.

Funder

U.S. Geological Survey

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

Reference66 articles.

1. The changing face of the wildlife profession: tools for creating women leaders;Anderson W. S.;Human‐Wildlife Interactions,2020

2. Synergies among extinction drivers under global change

3. Brown T. L. D. J.Decker andJ. W.Enck.1992. The Wildlife Society Membership Survey. Human Dimensions Research Unit Series Publication 92‐11. Department of Natural Resources Cornell Univeristy Ithaca New York. 29pp.

4. Genetic structure provides insights into the geographic origins and temporal change in the invasive charru mussel (Sururu) in the southeastern United States

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3