Prenatal diagnosis and postnatal outcome of type III vasa previa: systematic review of literature

Author:

Pozzoni M.12ORCID,Sammaria C.12,Villanacci R.12,Borgese C.12,Ghisleri F.12,Farina A.34ORCID,Candiani M.12,Cavoretto P. I.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy

2. Vita‐Salute San Raffaele University Milan Italy

3. Obstetric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna Italy

4. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC) Alma Mater Studiorum‐University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna Italy

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectiveVasa previa (VP) is a condition characterized by fetal blood vessels located on the amniotic membranes and outside the placenta, within 2 cm from internal os. The most common forms of VP are associated to velamentous cord insertion (type I) or to bilobed‐succenturiate placenta (type II), located across the cervix. A rare form of VP, not necessarily associated to other placental or vascular anomalies, involves aberrant vessels running from the placenta to the amniotic membranes, nearby the internal os, and then turning back to the placenta (type III). Although early diagnosis of type III VP is important, it often technically challenging and difficult. The objective of our study is to gather the current available evidence on type III VP related to prenatal diagnosis and perinatal outcome.MethodsA systematic review of the literature was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines from inception up to March 2023 using common internet‐based databases (PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE) looking for perinatal diagnosis of atypical type III vasa previa. Data extraction and tabulation was carried out by two different operators and double‐checked by a third senior author. Quality assessment of the included studies was realized using the National Institute of Health (NIH) tool for the quality assessment of Case Series Studies. Recent unpublished cases were searched in our local ultrasound database. Frequencies and proportions of prenatally vs. postnatally diagnosed type III VP were summarized, including clinical expression and perinatal outcomes.ResultsEighteen cases of type III VP were detected: 16 with prenatal diagnosis (14 from 10 publications and 2 unpublished from our center) and 2 with postnatal diagnosis from two publications. All cases with prenatal diagnosis were assessed by transvaginal ultrasound at a mean gestational age of 29 weeks (median 31 weeks; range 19‐38 weeks). Conception was achieved with IVF in 4/16 (25%), there were no prenatal symptoms in 15/18 cases (83.3%), in two cases (11.1 %) there was vaginal bleeding and in one (5.6%) preterm labour. Only 3/18 (16.6%) cases had no placental abnormality and 15/18 (83.3 %) showed at least one placental abnormality including: low‐lying insertion (9/17), succenturiate or accessory lobe (1/17), velamentous cord insertion (3/18), marginal insertion (9/18). All cases with prenatal diagnosis were liveborn with cesarean section before rupture of membranes at a mean gestational age of 35.4 weeks (range 32‐38) without neonatal complications. Emergent cesarean section was observed in 2/16 cases with prenatal diagnosis and 1/2 cases with postnatal diagnosis (rates: 12.5% vs 50%; p‐value: 0.179), Apgar score≤7 at 1 or 5 minutes in prenatally vs postnatally diagnosed cases was observed in 5/16 vs 1/2 cases (p=0.595) and 3/16 vs 1/2 cases (p=0.316), respectively.ConclusionsThe prenatal diagnosis of VP type III is challenging with few cases reported in the literature; however, it minimizes the risks of an adverse outcome with intact membranes early‐term elective cesarean delivery. Since clinical manifestations and risk factors are not specific, and type III VP cannot be excluded when there is a normal cord insertion or just one placental mass, a generalized screening by transvaginal ultrasound in the general population is recommended, particularly in presence of low‐lying or morphologically abnormal placentas and medically assisted reproduction.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3