Visual biofeedback for shortening the second stage of labor: randomized controlled trial

Author:

Preuss E.12,De Porto A.12,Zisman I.12,Bason Hila12,Ron‐tal O.12,Tovbin J.12,Barzilay E.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital Ashdod Israel

2. Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben‐Gurion University of the Negev Beer‐Sheva Israel

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo examine whether visual biofeedback can be used during labor as an effective tool for shortening the second stage of labor and reducing the need for instrumental delivery.MethodsThis was a prospective, single‐center, randomized controlled trial. Nulliparous women under epidural anesthesia with full dilatation were randomized into the biofeedback and control groups (50 patients in each group). Both groups received coached maternal pushing during four consecutive contractions while an experienced obstetrician was performing transperineal ultrasound. Only women in the biofeedback group observed the ultrasound display screen. Following this intervention, labor was managed routinely by the obstetric team. Angle of progression (AOP) was measured at rest and while pushing before and during the first and fourth contraction. Second stage duration and delivery outcomes were compared between the groups.ResultsVisual did not affect second stage duration (2.28 hours in the biofeedback group, IQR 1.25‐3.1, vs. 2.08 hours in the control group, IQR 1.58‐3.02, p = 0.981). AOP was significantly higher in the biofeedback group compared to the control group both at rest before the fourth contraction (142.6 ± 15.9 vs. 136.8 ± 13.1, respectively, p = 0.049) and while pushing during the fourth contraction (159.3 ± 19.2 vs. 149.4 ± 15.1, respectively, p = 0.005). Increase in AOP was significantly higher in the biofeedback compared to the control group in last push (16.6 ± 11 vs. 12.6 ± 8.3, respectively, p = 0.041) as well as total increase of AOP (24.4 ± 13.6 vs. 17.9 ± 11.3, respectively, p = 0.011). The overall rate of intact perineum was similar (12% vs. 8%, respectively, p=0.505).ConclusionsVisual biofeedback during the second stage of labor may facilitate descent of fetal head during maternal pushing without affecting second stage duration, possibly due to the short duration of the intervention. Future studies should be focused on continuous intervention throughout the second stage of labor.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Time to focus on the role of the pelvic floor in vaginal delivery;Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology;2024-01

2. Reply;Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology;2024-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3