Affiliation:
1. Center for Evaluation and Development Mannheim Germany
2. School of Public Affairs Arizona State University Phoenix Arizona USA
3. Institute for the Future University of Nicosia Nicosia Cyprus
4. W.P. Carey School of Business Arizona State University Tempe Arizona USA
Abstract
AbstractMinimum quality regulations are often justified in the childcare market because of the presence of information frictions between parents and providers. However, regulations can also have unintended consequences for the quantity and quality of services provided. In this paper, we merge new data on states’ childcare regulations for maximum classroom group sizes and child‐to‐staff ratios with the universe of online job postings to study the impact of regulations on the demand for and characteristics of childcare labor. Our identification strategy exploits the unprecedented variation in regulatory reform during the COVID‐19 pandemic, relying on changes both within states over time and across children's age groups. We find evidence that these regulations reduce the number of childcare job postings and encourage providers to substitute away from higher‐skilled postings, thereby increasing the number of positions that are out‐of‐compliance with states’ teacher education requirements. In sum, the results imply that childcare regulations may reduce the demand for childcare labor, while simultaneously altering the composition of the workforce.
Reference56 articles.
1. Women, War, and Wages: The Effect of Female Labor Supply on the Wage Structure at Midcentury
2. The impact of Covid‐19 on the U.S. child care market: Evidence from stay‐at‐home orders;Ali U.;Economics of Education Review,2021
3. Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2023).2023 KIDS COUNT databook.
4. Macroeconomics of the Great Influenza Pandemic, 1918–1920
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献