Validation and psychometric properties of the Persian version of the MISSCARE survey

Author:

Rahimi Shoeleh12ORCID,Ebadi Abbas3ORCID,Khankeh Hamid Reza45ORCID,Eghbali Mohammad6ORCID,Sharifi Azam7ORCID,Mohammadian Batol8ORCID,Lotfi Mohammad Sajjad9

Affiliation:

1. University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences (USWR) Tehran Iran

2. Educational Supervisor of Faghihi Hospital in Shiraz Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Fars Iran

3. Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Life style institute, Nursing Faculty Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

4. Health in Emergency and Disaster research center University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences Tehran Iran

5. Department of Clinical Science and Education Karolinska Institute Stockholm Sweden

6. Department of Nursing, school of Nursing and Midwifery Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences Torbat Heydariyeh Iran

7. Nahavand School of Allied Medical Sciences Hamadan University of Medical Sciences Hamadan Iran

8. Department of Operating Room, School of Allied Medical Sciences Gonabad University of Medical Sciences Gonabad Iran

9. Trauma Nursing Research Centre, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery Kashan University of Medical Sciences Kashan Iran

Abstract

AbstractAimTo conduct, translate, and psychometric evaluation of the MISSCARE‐Persian Survey.DesignA cross‐sectional study was conducted in Iran in February–June 2021.MethodsThe translation of the MISSCARE Survey was accomplished according to World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. Construct validity was performed by (N = 300) exploratory factor analysis and confirmation. To assess the reliability, internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and relative stability was assessed using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The study adhered to COSMIN guidelines.ResultsThe exploratory factor analysis, which resulted in the identification of three factors in the second part of the tool, explained 79.6% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the model's good fit of information. The reliability of the first and second parts of the tool was 0.912 and 0.901, respectively. Additionally, the ICC was found to be 0.687 for the first and 0.706 for the second part of the tool.

Funder

University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Nursing

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3