Long‐term clinical and radiological outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy on stable knees are better for traumatic tears when compared to degenerative lesions: A systematic review

Abstract

AbstractPurposeAn arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) for degenerative meniscus lesions and traumatic meniscus tears are two distinct entities and their long‐term outcomes are rarely reported. The aim of this review was to compare the long‐term (clinical and radiological) results of APM performed on stable knees for traumatic tears (TT) or degenerative lesions (DL).MethodsPubmed, Scopus and Embase databases were searched to identify relevant studies published between 2010 and 2023 using the keywords ‘meniscectomy’ OR ‘meniscectomies’ OR ‘meniscal resection’. English‐language, Levels I–IV evidence studies reporting either radiographic or clinical outcome measures with a minimum of 6 years' follow‐up after APM were included. Studies including discoid meniscus, open meniscectomy, unstable knee and combination with other procedures were excluded. To rate the quality of evidence, the methodological index for non‐randomized studies was used.ResultsThirty‐two studies were included, with follow‐up periods ranging from 6 to 22 years. Eleven studies dealt with TT with a mean age of 31.5 ± 6.6 years and a mean follow‐up of 11.6 ± 6.9 years. At the last follow‐up, radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) ranged from 36% to 76%, with an average rate of 48 ± 19%; functional scores ranged from 71 to 97, with a mean of 90 ± 4 for the Lysholm score, 86 ± 10 for the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and 94 ± 16 for the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome (KOOS). Twenty‐one studies dealt with DL with a mean age of 49.9 ± 7.2 years and a mean follow‐up of 14.9 ± 6.3 years. At the last follow‐up, radiographic OA ranged from 23% to 97%, with an average rate of 77 ± 28%; functional scores ranged from 40 to 87, with a mean of 79 ± 10 for the Lysholm score and 71 ± 16 for the IKDC.ConclusionTen‐year clinical outcomes of APM are better for TTs when compared to DLs. Rates of OA are difficult to compare but lower for TTs.Level of EvidenceLevel IV.