Postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone in pN1 oral cavity cancer patients: A meta‐analysis

Author:

Tsai Tsung‐You1ORCID,Chiang Pin‐Chun12,Yap Wing‐Keen3,Huang Yenlin456ORCID,See Anna17ORCID,Hung Shao‐Yu8,Lu Chuieng‐Yi8,Lin Chien‐Yu39,Chang Tung‐Chieh Joseph23ORCID,Kao Huang‐Kai28,Chang Kai‐Ping12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Taoyuan Taiwan

2. College of Medicine Chang Gung University Taoyuan Taiwan

3. Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital‐Linkou Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology Chang Gung University Taoyuan Taiwan

4. Department of Anatomic Pathology Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou Branch Taoyuan Taiwan

5. Institute of Stem Cell and Translation Cancer Research Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou Branch Taoyuan Taiwan

6. School of Medicine National Tsing‐Hua University Hsinchu Taiwan

7. Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Singapore General Hospital Singapore

8. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou Branch Taoyuan Taiwan

9. Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, College of Medicine Chang Gung University Taoyuan Taiwan

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe aim of this meta‐analysis is to evaluate the potential benefits of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with pN1 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.MethodsA literature search through major databases was conducted until January 2023. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of different survival outcomes were extracted and pooled.ResultsTen studies published between 2005 and 2022, with a pooled patient population of 2888, were included in this meta‐analysis. Due to differences in study design and reported outcomes, the studies were categorized into distinct groups. In pN1 patients without extranodal extension (ENE), PORT was associated with a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) (aHR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.61–0.94). In pN1 patients without ENE and positive margins, PORT improved OS (aHR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56–0.89) and was associated with a lower regional recurrence rate (RR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.15–0.83). However, in pN1 patients without ENE, positive margins, perineural invasion, and lymphovascular invasion, there were no significant differences observed between the PORT and observation groups in either 5‐year OS (RR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.07–3.41) or 5‐year disease‐free survival (RR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.07–2.06).ConclusionsThe current study demonstrated that PORT has the potential to improve OS in pN1 disease. However, the decision of whether to administer PORT still hinges on diverse clinical scenarios, and additional research is necessary to furnish a more conclusive resolution.Level of Evidence2.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3