Outcomes following cochlear implantation with eluting electrodes: A systematic review

Author:

Fleet Alex1ORCID,Nikookam Yasmin2ORCID,Radotra Anshul3,Gowrishankar Shravan1ORCID,Metcalfe Christopher3ORCID,Muzaffar Jameel12ORCID,Smith Matthew E.1ORCID,Monksfield Peter2ORCID,Bance Manohar1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Health Campus University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

2. Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way Edgbaston Birmingham UK

3. The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust New Cross Hospital Wolverhampton UK

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo establish audiological and other outcomes following cochlear implantation in humans and animals with eluting electrodes.MethodsSystematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched (April 2023): MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science. Studies reporting outcomes in either humans or animals following cochlear implantation with a drug‐eluting electrode were included. No limits were placed on language or year of publication. Risk of bias assessment was performed on all included studies using either the Brazzelli or Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) assessment tools. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement.ResultsSearches identified 146 abstracts and 108 full texts. Of these, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes in 523 animals (17 studies) and 24 humans (1 study). Eluting electrodes included dexamethasone (16 studies), aracytine (1 study), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (1 study), the growth factors insulin‐like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (1 study), and neurotrophin‐3 (1 study). All included studies compare outcomes following implantation with an eluting electrode with a control non‐eluting electrode. In the majority of studies, audiological outcomes (e.g., auditory brainstem response threshold) were superior following implantation with an eluting electrode compared with a standard electrode. Most studies which investigated post‐implantation impedance reported lower impedance following implantation with an eluting electrode. The influence of eluting electrodes on other reported outcomes (including post‐implantation cochlear fibrosis and the survival of hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons) was more varied across the included studies.ConclusionsEluting electrodes have shown promise in animal studies in preserving residual hearing following cochlear implantation and in reducing impedance, though data from human studies remain lacking. Further in‐human studies will be required to determine the clinical usefulness of drug‐eluting cochlear implants as a future treatment for sensorineural hearing loss.

Funder

NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3