Health Disparities Research in Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Scoping Review

Author:

Barr Jeremy1ORCID,Mackie Aaron2,Gorelik Daniel3ORCID,Buckingham Hannah4,Clark Delaney4,Brissett Anthony E.3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston Texas USA

2. School of Medicine Texas A&M University Bryan Texas USA

3. Department of Otolaryngology Houston Methodist Hospital Houston Texas USA

4. School of Medicine University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveHealth disparities contribute significantly to disease, health outcomes, and access to care. Little is known about the state of health disparities in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (FPRS). This scoping review aims to synthesize the existing disparities research in FPRS and guide future disparities‐related efforts.Data SourcesPubMed, Embase, Web of Science.Review MethodsWe conducted a scoping review in adherence with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Our search included all years through March 03, 2023. All peer‐reviewed primary literature of any design related to disparities in FPRS was eligible for inclusion.ResultsOf the 12283 unique abstracts identified, 215 studies underwent full‐text review, and 108 remained for final review. The most frequently examined topics were cleft lip and palate (40.7%), facial trauma (29.6%), and gender affirmation (9.3%). There was limited coverage of other areas. Consideration of race/ethnicity (68.5%), socioeconomic status (65.7%), and gender/sex (40.7%) were most common. Social capital (0%), religion, occupation, and features of relationships were least discussed (0.01% each). The majority of studies were published after 2018 (59.2%) and were of nonprospective designs (95.4%). Most studies focused on disparity detection (80.6%) and few focused on understanding (13.9%) or reducing disparities (5.6%).ConclusionThis study captures the existing literature on health disparities in FPRS. Studies are concentrated in a few areas of FPRS and are primarily in the detecting phase of public health research. Our review highlights several gaps and opportunities for future disparities‐related focus.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference124 articles.

1. Health disparities: gaps in access, quality and affordability of medical care;Riley WJ;Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc,2012

2. discussion172‐174.

3. Healthcare Disparities in Laryngology: A Scoping Review

4. US Department of Health and Human Services.Healthy People 2030. Accessed February 17 2023.https://health.gov/healthypeople

5. National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Committee on Community‐Based Solutions to Promote Health Equity in the United States. Communities in Action: Pathways to Health Equity. In: Baciu A Negussie Y Geller A et al. eds. The State of Health Disparities in the United States. National Academies Press (US); 2017.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3