Barbed sutures and skin adhesives improve wound closure in hip and knee arthroplasty

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThis study aimed to formulate evidence‐based recommendations for optimising wound management in hip and knee arthroplasty by exploring alternative methods such as barbed sutures and skin adhesives.MethodsA Delphi panel, comprising seven orthopaedic surgeons, one musculoskeletal infectious disease specialist, and one health economics expert, was convened to evaluate the use of barbed sutures and skin adhesives for wound closure in hip and knee arthroplasty. Two systematic reviews informed the development of questionnaires, with panelists ranking their agreement on statements using a 5‐point Likert scale. Consensus was achieved if ≥75% agreement. Unresolved statements were revisited in a second round.ResultsConsensus was reached on 11 statements, providing evidence‐based recommendations. The expert panel advocates for a multilayer watertight technique using barbed sutures to prevent surgical site infections (SSI), reduce complications, shorten surgical times, optimise resources and improve cosmetic appearance. For skin closure, the panel recommends topical adhesives to decrease wound dehiscence, enhance cosmetic appearance, promote patient compliance, prevent SSIs, and optimise resources.ConclusionThe Delphi consensus by Italian total joint arthroplasty experts underscores the pivotal role of barbed sutures and skin adhesives in optimising outcomes. While guiding clinical decision‐making, these recommendations are not prescriptive and should be adapted to local practices. The study encourages further research to enhance current evidence.Level of EvidenceLevel III.