Assessing the truthfulness of security and defence news in Central and Eastern Europe: The role of cognitive style and the promise of epistemic sophistication

Author:

Mustață Marinel‐Adi12ORCID,Răpan Ivona3,Dumitrescu Lucian4,Dobreva Hristina5,Dimov Petko5,Lis Andrzej6,Révayová Eva7,Marineanu Vasile8,Buluc Ruxandra9,Olariu Cosmin1,Lucinescu Alexandru1,Buță Cosmin10

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Security and Defence “Carol I” National Defence University Bucharest Romania

2. Section of Military Sciences Romanian Academy of Scientists Bucharest Romania

3. Institute of National Economy Romanian Academy Bucharest Romania

4. Institute for Sociology Romanian Academy Bucharest Romania

5. Department of Distance Learning and Language Training and Qualification Rakovski National Defence College Sofia Bulgaria

6. Department of Business Excellence Nicolaus Copernicus University Toruń Poland

7. Department of Social Studies and Languages Armed Forces Academy of General Milan Rastislav Štefánik Demänová Slovakia

8. Department of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences University of Bucharest Bucharest Romania

9. National Institute for Intelligence Studies “Mihai Viteazul” National Intelligence Academy Bucharest Romania

10. Faculty of Command and Staff ”Carol I” National Defence University Bucharest Romania

Abstract

AbstractIn this study, we sought to determine whether findings associating cognitive style with news evaluation can be generalized within a Central and Eastern European (CEE) context. We examined the relevance of actively open‐minded thinking, need for cognition, analyticity, and dogmatism in determining the truthfulness of security and defence news headlines. Drawing from a sample of 500 participants from Bulgaria, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia, our results align closely with effect sizes documented in mainstream literature concerning belief in fake news (BFN). In contrast, none of the tested cognitive style measures predicted belief in real news (BRN), and the cognitive reflection test yielded no usable results. The study also explored the utility of a new measure: epistemic sophistication. Our findings were moderately promising for the multiplicism subscale in predicting both BFN and BRN.

Funder

Academia Oamenilor de Știință din România

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3