Affiliation:
1. Health and Physical Education, School of Education and Social Work, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
2. School of Public Health, Prevention Research Collaboration, Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
Abstract
AbstractIssue AddressedHealth literacy (HL) can be developed throughout the lifespan starting from the early years highlighting that educational institutions, curriculum and teachers are powerful settings, places and people that can foster HL in youth. Current research shows that Australian teachers need more support to teach health education that promotes students' HL, with limited research focusing on pre‐service teachers (PST). This study aims to identify the HL strengths and challenges of PST at one Australian university across two initial teacher education programs (HPE and primary) and compare their health literacy profiles with that of the Australian general population.MethodsThe Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) was administered in March and April, 2022 to measure HL in Australian PST. The research setting was a university in Sydney, Australia, with two of the University's undergraduate initial teacher education (ITE) programs (Health and Physical Education [HPE] and Primary). Of the 24 PST in the HPE cohort, 23 consented. Of the 70 PST in the Primary cohort, 34 consented. The results were compared with Australian Bureau of Statistics data.ResultsThe participants' median age was 22.3(4.3) years (SD), age ranged from 20 to 54 years, with 36% of participants under the age of 22 years. When comparing the PST data with the general population there were two significant differences: (1) PST scored significantly higher than the general population for Domain 4 (Social support for health, 3.41 vs. 3.19; p < 0.001; d = 0.57); and (2) the PST scored significantly lower for Domain 9 (Understand health information enough to know what to do, 4.02 vs. 4.27; p < 0.01; d = −0.43). In addition, we found that primary PST had significantly lower scores for domains 5–9 (demonstrative of interactive and critical HL), compared with the general Australian population.ConclusionsFindings show that PST strengths are that they perceive that there they are able to access social support for health, however the PST find it more difficult to analyse and apply health information, compared with the general Australian population.So What?Further understanding of health literacy profiles of Australian PST should influence the design of ITE programs and its health education curricular to ensure that PST are able to further develop their HL understandings and capabilities.
Reference46 articles.
1. Australian Bureau of Statistics.National health survey: Health literacy.2018.https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/health-conditions-and-risks/national-health-survey-health-literacy/latest-release.
2. World Health Organisation (WHO).WHO Global Health Estimates 2019.2019.https://www.who.int/data/global-health-estimates.
3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW).Australia's Health 2018. Australia's Health series no. 16. AUS 221. AIHW.2018.https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/7c42913d‐295f‐4bc9‐9c24‐4e44eff4a04a/aihw‐aus‐221.pdf.
4. The global impact of non-communicable diseases on macro-economic productivity: a systematic review
5. Trends in health inequalities in 27 European countries;Mackenbach JP;Proc Natl Acad Sci,2018