Validation of MLC leaf open time calculation methods for PSQA in adaptive radiotherapy with tomotherapy units

Author:

Nasrallah Marie1,Bochud François1,Tellapragada Neelima2,Bourhis Jean3,Chao Edward2,Casey Dylan2,Moeckli Raphaël1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Radiation Physics Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University Lausanne Switzerland

2. Accuray Incorporated Madison Wisconsin USA

3. Radiation Oncology Department Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University Lausanne Switzerland

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundTreatment delivery safety and accuracy are essential to control the disease and protect healthy tissues in radiation therapy. For usual treatment, a phantom‐based patient specific quality assurance (PSQA) is performed to verify the delivery prior to the treatment. The emergence of adaptive radiation therapy (ART) adds new complexities to PSQA. In fact, organ at risks and target volume re‐contouring as well as plan re‐optimization and treatment delivery are performed with the patient immobilized on the treatment couch, making phantom‐based pretreatment PSQA impractical. In this case, phantomless PSQA tools based on multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf open times (LOTs) verifications provide alternative approaches for the Radixact® treatment units. However, their validity is compromised by the lack of independent and reliable methods for calculating the LOT performed by the MLC during deliveries.PurposeTo provide independent and reliable methods of LOT calculation for the Radixact® treatment units.MethodsTwo methods for calculating the LOTs performed by the MLC during deliveries have been implemented. The first method uses the signal recorded by the build‐in detector and the second method uses the signal recorded by optical sensors mounted on the MLC. To calibrate the methods to the ground truth, in‐phantom ionization chamber LOT measurements have been conducted on a Radixact® treatment unit. The methods were validated by comparing LOT calculations with in‐phantom ionization chamber LOT measurements performed on two Radixact® treatment units.ResultsThe study shows a good agreement between the two LOT calculation methods and the in‐phantom ionization chamber measurements. There are no notable differences between the two methods and the same results were observed on the different treatment units.ConclusionsThe two implemented methods have the potential to be part of a PSQA solution for ART in tomotherapy.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference31 articles.

1. MarkusA SaraB CarlosDW et al.Guidelines for the verification of imrt ESTRO Booklet No. 9;2008:127p. ISBN 90‐804532‐9.

2. Swiss Society of Radiobiology and Medical Physics.Quality control for Intensity‐modulated radiation therapy Recommendations No. 15;2007:17p. ISBN 3 908 125 41 3.

3. Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: Recommendations of AAPM Task Group No. 218

4. Dosimetry tools and techniques for IMRT

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3