Applying the six‐sigma methodology to determine the limits of quality control (QC) tests for a specific linear accelerator

Author:

Ma Min1,Li Minghui1,Zhang Ke1ORCID,Ma Pan1,Hu Zhihui1,Yan Hui1,Men Kuo1,Dai Jianrong1

Affiliation:

1. National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China

Abstract

AbstractPurposeWe aimed to show the framework of the six‐sigma methodology (SSM) that can be used to determine the limits of QC tests for the linear accelerator (Linac). Limits for QC tests are individually determined using the SSM.Methods and MaterialsThe SSM is based on the define‐measure‐analyze‐improve‐control (DMAIC) stages to improve the process. In the “define” stage, the limits of QC tests were determined. In the “measure” stage, a retrospective collection of daily QC data using a Machine Performance Check platform was performed from January 2020 to December 2022. In the “analyze” stage, the process of determining the limits was proposed using statistical analyses and process capability indices. In the “improve” stage, the capability index was used to calculate the action limits. The tolerance limit was established using the larger one of the control limits in the individual control chart (I‐chart). In the “control” stage, daily QC data were collected prospectively from January 2023 to May 2023 to monitor the effect of action limits and tolerance limits.ResultsA total of 798 sets of QC data including beam, isocenter, collimation, couch, and gantry tests were collected and analyzed. The Collimation Rotation offset test had the min‐Cp, min‐Cpk, min‐Pp, and min‐Ppk at 2.53, 1.99, 1.59, and 1.25, respectively. The Couch Rtn test had the max‐Cp, max‐Cpk, max‐Pp, and max‐Ppk at 31.5, 29.9, 23.4, and 22.2, respectively. There are three QC tests with higher action limits than the original tolerance. Some data on the I‐chart of the beam output change, isocenter KV offset, and jaw X1 exceeded the lower tolerance and action limit, which indicated that a system deviation occurred and reminded the physicist to take action to improve the process.ConclusionsThe SSM is an excellent framework to use in determining the limits of QC tests. The process capability index is an important parameter that provides quantitative information on determining the limits of QC tests.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3