Off‐iso Winston‐Lutz test on seven linear accelerators

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThe aim of this study is to find optimal gantry, collimator, and couch angles for performing single isocenter, multiple target stereotactic radiosurgery (SIMT‐SRS). Nineteen angle sets were tested across seven linear accelerators for radiation‐isocenter coincidence and off‐isocenter coincidence. The off‐isocenter Winston‐Lutz test was performed to evaluate the accuracy of isocenter alignment for each angle set, and optimal angle sets as well as maximum off‐isocenter distance to target for each angle set was determined. The influence of simulated patient weight on off‐iso Winston‐Lutz test accuracy was also inspected.MethodThe SNC MultiMet‐WL phantom and MultiMet‐WL QA Software v2.1 were used for the direct measurement and analysis of the off‐iso Winston‐Lutz test (also referred to as Winston‐Lutz‐Gao test). A two‐step method was developed to ensure precise initial placement of the target. Nineteen beams were delivered at 6X energy and 2 × 2 cm field size to each of six targets on the MultiMet Cube with couch kicks at five cardinal angles (90°, 45°, 0°, 315°, and 270°). To reduce imaging uncertainty, only EPID was used in target alignment and test image acquisition. A total of 200 Ibs (90.7 kg) of weight was also used to mimic patient weight. All tests were performed on both the free table and the weighted table.ResultsFor two new TrueBeam machines, the maximum offset was within the 1 mm tolerance when the off‐iso distance is less than 7 cm. Two older VitalBeam machines exhibited unfavorable gantry, couch, and collimator (GCC) angle sets: Linac No. 3 at (0,90,0), (0,270,0) and Linac No. 4 at (0,45,45) and (0,90,0). The C‐Series Linacs failed in the majority of GCC angle sets, with Linac No. 5 exhibiting a maximum offset of 1.53 mm. Four of seven machines show a clear trend that offset increases with off‐isocenter distance. Additionally, the IGRT table was less susceptible to the addition of simulated patient weight than the ExactCouch.ConclusionAmong the seven linear accelerators addressed, newer model machines such as the Varian TrueBeam were more precise than older models, especially in comparison to the C‐Series Linacs. The newer machines are more suitable for delivering SIMT‐SRS procedures in all GCC angle sets, and the results indicate that newer TrueBeams are capable of performing SIMT‐SRS procedures at all angle sets for targets of off‐iso distances up to 7 cm. The trend that offset between the target center and radiation field center increases with off‐iso distance, however, does not always hold true across machines. This may be comprised by the EPID's severe off‐axis horn effect. Lastly, the IGRT couch was less susceptible to patient weight compared to ExactCouch in the off‐isocenter Winston‐Lutz test.