Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish Traumatic Grief Inventory Self‐Report Plus (TGI‐SR+) in bereaved parents

Author:

Lenferink Lonneke I. M.123,van Dijk Iris2,Eisma Maarten C.3ORCID,Eklund Rakel4,Boelen Paul A.25ORCID,Sveen Josefin46ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, Faculty of Behavioural Management and Social Sciences University of Twente Enschede The Netherlands

2. Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands

3. Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

4. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University Uppsala University Hospital Uppsala Sweden

5. ARQ National Psychotrauma Centre Diemen The Netherlands

6. Centre for Crisis Psychology, Faculty of Psychology University of Bergen Bergen Norway

Abstract

AbstractThe International Classification of Diseases Eleventh Edition (ICD‐11), and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM‐5‐TR), now include prolonged grief disorder (PGD). Since criteria for PGD in both classification systems differ from prior proposed grief disorders and each other, the validation of a single instrument to screen for prolonged grief (PG) symptoms of both new diagnoses is critical for bereavement research and care. Therefore, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Traumatic Grief Inventory Self‐Report Plus (TGI‐SR+). Two‐hundred and forty‐eight bereaved parents completed questions about sociodemographic and loss‐related variables, the TGI‐SR+, and symptom measures of post‐traumatic stress (PTS), depression and an older measure of PG symptoms, the Prolonged Grief Disorder‐13 (PG‐13). Confirmatory factor analyses showed that a one‐factor model best fit DSM‐5‐TR and ICD‐11 PG symptoms and the analyses of the internal consistency and inter‐item correlations showed that these symptoms could be reliably assessed. In support of convergent validity, DSM‐5‐TR and ICD‐11 PG symptoms correlated with symptoms of PTS, depression and PG assessed with the PG‐13. In support of known‐groups validity, DSM‐5‐TR and ICD‐11 PG symptoms were higher among lower educated (vs. higher educated) participants and related negatively to time since loss. ROC analyses showed optimal cut‐off score of ≥71 and ≥72 to determine probable caseness for DSM‐5‐TR and ICD‐11 PGD, respectively. Results support the reliability and validity of the Swedish TGI‐SR+ as a screening instrument for PG in research and bereavement care.

Funder

Barncancerfonden

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Clinical Psychology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3