Enhancing Early Systems R&D Capabilities with Systems —Theoretic Process Analysis

Author:

Williams Adam D.

Abstract

ABSTRACTSystems engineering today faces a wide array of challenges, ranging from new operational environments to disruptive technological — necessitating approaches to improve research and development (R&D) efforts. Yet, emphasizing the Aristotelian argument that the “whole is greater than the sum of its parts” seems to offer a conceptual foundation creating new R&D solutions. Invoking systems theoretic concepts of emergence and hierarchy and analytic characteristics of traceability, rigor, and comprehensiveness is potentially beneficial for guiding R&D strategy and development to bridge the gap between theoretical problem spaces and engineering‐based solutions. In response, this article describes systems–theoretic process analysis (STPA) as an example of one such approach to aid in early‐systems R&D discussions. STPA—a ‘top‐down’ process that abstracts real complex system operations into hierarchical control structures, functional control loops, and control actions—uses control loop logic to analyze how control actions (designed for desired system behaviors) may become violated and drive the complex system toward states of higher risk. By analyzing how needed controls are not provided (or out of sequence or stopped too soon) and unneeded controls are provided (or engaged too long), STPA can help early‐system R&D discussions by exploring how requirements and desired actions interact to either mitigate or potentially increase states of risk that can lead to unacceptable losses. This article will demonstrate STPA's benefit for early‐system R&D strategy and development discussion by describing such diverse use cases as cyber security, nuclear fuel transportation, and US electric grid performance. Together, the traceability, rigor, and comprehensiveness of STPA serve as useful tools for improving R&D strategy and development discussions. Leveraging STPA as well as related systems engineering techniques can be helpful in early R&D planning and strategy development to better triangulate deeper theoretical meaning or evaluate empirical results to better inform systems engineering solutions.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Environmental Science

Reference16 articles.

1. Bakirtzis G. B. T.Carter C. H.Fleming andC. R.Elks.2017. “MISSION AWARE: Evidence-Based Mission-Centric Cybersecurity Analysis.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.01448.

2. Electric Power Research Institute.2021.Hazard Analysis Methods for Digital Instrumentation and Control Systems Technical Report—Revision 1 (3002016698) Palo Alto US-CA.

3. Fleming C. H.2015. “Safety-driven early concept analysis and development.” Dissertation Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Cambridge US-MA).

4. Improving Hazard Analysis and Certification of Integrated Modular Avionics

5. International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE).2023. “About Systems Engineering.”https://www.incose.org/about-systems-engineering.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3