Pairing Bayesian Methods and Systems Theory to Enable Test and Evaluation of Learning‐Based Systems

Abstract

ABSTRACTModern engineered systems, and learning‐based systems, in particular, provide unprecedented complexity that requires advancement in our methods to achieve confidence in mission success through test and evaluation (T&E). We define learning‐based systems as engineered systems that incorporate a learning algorithm (artificial intelligence) component of the overall system. A part of the unparalleled complexity is the rate at which learning‐based systems change over traditional engineered systems. Where traditional systems are expected to steadily decline (change) in performance due to time (aging), learning‐based systems undergo a constant change which must be better understood to achieve high confidence in mission success. To this end, we propose pairing Bayesian methods with systems theory to quantify changes in operational conditions, changes in adversarial actions, resultant changes in the learning‐based system structure, and resultant confidence measures in mission success. We provide insights, in this article, into our overall goal and progress toward developing a framework for evaluation through an understanding of equivalence of testing.