Immunoglobulin G genetic variation can confound assessment of antibody levels via altered binding to detection reagents

Author:

Purcell Ruth A1ORCID,Aurelia L Carissa1,Esterbauer Robyn1ORCID,Allen Lilith F1,Bond Katherine A12,Williamson Deborah A234,Trevillyan Janine M45,Trubiano Jason A5678,Juno Jennifer J1ORCID,Wheatley Adam K1,Davenport Miles P9,Nguyen Thi HO1ORCID,Kedzierska Katherine1ORCID,Kent Stephen J110ORCID,Selva Kevin John1,Chung Amy W1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Microbiology and Immunology The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne Melbourne VIC Australia

2. Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory (VIDRL) The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity Melbourne VIC Australia

3. Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research Parkville VIC Australia

4. Department of Infectious Diseases The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne Melbourne VIC Australia

5. Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Department of Infectious Diseases Austin Health Heidelberg VIC Australia

6. Department of Medicine University of Melbourne Parkville VIC Australia

7. Department of Infectious Diseases Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne VIC Australia

8. National Centre for Infections in Cancer Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne VIC Australia

9. Kirby Institute University of New South Wales Kensington NSW Australia

10. Melbourne Sexual Health Centre and Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health, Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesAmino acid variations across more than 30 immunoglobulin (Ig) allotypes may introduce structural changes that influence recognition by anti‐Ig detection reagents, consequently confounding interpretation of antibody responses, particularly in genetically diverse cohorts. Here, we assessed a panel of commercial monoclonal anti‐IgG1 clones for capacity to universally recognise two dominant IgG1 haplotypes (G1m‐1,3 and G1m1,17).MethodsFour commercial monoclonal anti‐human IgG1 clones were assessed via ELISAs and multiplex bead‐based assays for their ability to bind G1m‐1,3 and G1m1,17 IgG1 variants. Detection antibodies were validated against monoclonal IgG1 allotype standards and tested for capacity to recognise antigen‐specific plasma IgG1 from G1m‐1,3 and G1m1,17 homozygous and heterozygous SARS‐CoV‐2 BNT162b2 vaccinated (n = 28) and COVID‐19 convalescent (n = 44) individuals. An Fc‐specific pan‐IgG detection antibody corroborated differences between hinge‐ and Fc‐specific anti‐IgG1 responses.ResultsHinge‐specific anti‐IgG1 clone 4E3 preferentially bound G1m1,17 compared to G1m‐1,3 IgG1. Consequently, SARS‐CoV‐2 Spike‐specific IgG1 levels detected in G1m1,17/G1m1,17 BNT162b2 vaccinees appeared 9‐ to 17‐fold higher than in G1m‐1,3/G1m‐1,3 vaccinees. Fc‐specific IgG1 and pan‐IgG detection antibodies equivalently bound G1m‐1,3 and G1m1,17 IgG1 variants, and detected comparable Spike‐specific IgG1 levels between haplotypes. IgG1 responses against other human coronaviruses and influenza were similarly poorly detected by 4E3 anti‐IgG1 in G1m‐1,3/G1m‐1,3 subjects.ConclusionAnti‐IgG1 clone 4E3 confounds assessment of antibody responses in clinical cohorts owing to bias towards detection of G1m1,17 IgG1 variants. Validation of anti‐Ig clones should include evaluation of binding to relevant antibody variants, particularly as the role of immunogenetics upon humoral immunity is increasingly explored in diverse populations.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3