Systematic review and meta‐analysis on population attributable fraction for physical inactivity to dementia-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Systematic review and meta‐analysis on population attributable fraction for physical inactivity to dementia

Published:2023-08-14 Issue:10 Volume:19 Page:4688-4704
ISSN:1552-5260
Container-title:Alzheimer's & Dementia
language:en
Short-container-title:Alzheimer's & Dementia

Author:

Feter Natan¹^ORCID,Leite Jayne S.²,da Silva Luísa Silveira³,Cassuriaga Júlia⁴,de Paula Danilo¹,Lopes Gabriela Wünsch¹,Hallal Pedro Rodrigues Curi⁵,Lee I‐Min⁶,Rombaldi Airton José⁴

Affiliation:

1. Post Graduate Program in Epidemiology Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Rio Grande do Sul Brazil

2. Post Graduate Program in Health Sciences Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Rio Grande do Sul Brazil

3. Post Graduate Program in Epidemiology Universidade Federal de Pelotas Pelotas Rio Grande do Sul Brazil

4. Postgraduate Program in Physical Education Universidade Federal de Pelotas Pelotas Rio Grande do Sul Brazil

5. Department of Kinesiology and Community Health University of Illinois Urbana‐Champaign Illinois USA

6. Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; and Department of Epidemiology Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractINTRODUCTIONThe number of cases of dementia attributable to physical inactivity remains unclear due to heterogeneity in physical inactivity definitions and statistical approaches used.METHODSStudies that used population‐based samples to estimate the population attributable fraction (PAF) of physical inactivity for dementia were included in this review. Weighted PAFs were adjusted for communality among the risk factors (i.e., inactive persons may also share other risk factors) analyzed. Values were reported as percentage (%) of cases of dementia attributable to physical inactivity.RESULTSWe included 22 studies. The overall impact of physical inactivity, defined by any criteria, on dementia ranged from 6.6% (95% CI: 3.6%, 9.6%; weighted) to 16.6% (95% CI: 14.4%, 18.9%; unweighted). Studies using the WHO criterion for physical inactivity estimated a higher unweighted impact (β = 7.3%; 95% CI: 2.0%, 12.6%) than studies using other criteria.DISCUSSIONConservatively, one in 15 cases of dementia may be attributable to physical inactivity, defined by any criteria.

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Neurology (clinical),Developmental Neuroscience,Health Policy,Epidemiology

Reference59 articles.

1. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

2. World Alzheimer Report 2018—The state of the art of dementia research: new frontiers;Patterson C;Alzheimer's Dis Int (ADI),2018

3. Global action plan on the public health response to dementia 2017‐2025;World Health Organization (WHO);World Health Organization,2017

4. Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019;Collaborators GBD 2019 DF;Lancet Pub Health,2022

5. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission