Predicting dimensional accuracy in 3D printed polydimethylsiloxane‐carbon nanotubes composites via machine learning

Author:

Raj Ratnesh1,Mahato Satyajit2,Moharana Annada Prasad1,Dixit Amit Rai1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines) Dhanbad Jharkhand India

2. Management Department Birla Institute of Technology Mesra, Ranchi India

Abstract

AbstractDirect ink writing (DIW) is a rapidly expanding additive manufacturing (AM) technique valued for its cost‐efficiency and material adaptability. While DIW offers substantial process flexibility, achieving precise manufacturing demands a thorough understanding of its printability parameters. Key process variables such as printing speed, nozzle‐bed gap, pulses for extrusion, and extrusion multiplier wield significant influence over the shape and dimensions of printed components. In this study, a machine learning model based on k‐nearest neighbors is employed to predict dimensional accuracy. The model is trained using measured width and thickness data from printed rings, with flow and printing‐speed tests defining parameter boundaries for printing. The final model demonstrates an accuracy of 81% and 74% for two PDMS‐CNT composite ink compositions. The principal components analysis underscores the pivotal roles of the extrusion factor and printing speed in achieving superior geometric fidelity. Additionally, retraction‐residual tests were conducted, revealing that the initial 10 seconds of extrusion hold critical importance as they can lead to distortions when traversing printed regions or perimeters, necessitating consideration in part design. To evaluate layer adhesion strength, a crucial aspect of AM, T‐peel tests were performed. Furthermore, rheological tests provided insights into extrudability, printable reinforcing percentages, shape retention, and yield stress.Highlights Rheological tests yield insights into minimum reinforcing% and shape retention. Developed k‐NN model predicts accuracy using measured printed rings' data. PC analysis shows key roles of extrusion factor and print speed. Retraction‐residual tests reveal initial 10 seconds are critical. Model validation results show 83.45% and 77.95% accuracy, close to prediction.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Materials Chemistry,Polymers and Plastics,General Chemistry,Ceramics and Composites

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3