Impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the in‐hospital diagnostic pathway of breast and colorectal cancer in the Netherlands: A population‐based study

Author:

Wolfkamp Wouter12,Meijer Joyce12,van Hoeve Jolanda C.12,van Erning Felice13,de Geus‐Oei Lioe‐Fee456,de Hingh Ignace378,Veltman Jeroen59,Siesling Sabine12ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Research and Development Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL) Utrecht the Netherlands

2. Department of Health Technology and Services Research University of Twente Enschede the Netherlands

3. Department of Surgical Oncology Catharina Cancer Institute Eindhoven the Netherlands

4. Department of Radiology Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) Leiden the Netherlands

5. Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group University of Twente Enschede the Netherlands

6. Department of Radiation Science & Technology Delft University of Technology Delft the Netherlands

7. Department of Knowledge and Advice Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL) Utrecht the Netherlands

8. Department of Epidemiology, GROW‐School for Oncology Reproduction Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands

9. Department of Radiology ZGT Almelo the Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIn the Netherlands, the COVID‐19 pandemic resulted in a temporary halt of population screening for cancer and limited hospital capacity for non‐COVID care. We aimed to investigate the impact of the pandemic on the in‐hospital diagnostic pathway of breast cancer (BC) and colorectal cancer (CRC).Methods71,159 BC and 48,900 CRC patients were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients, diagnosed between January 2020 and July 2021, were divided into six periods and compared to the average of patients diagnosed in the same periods in 2017–2019. Diagnostic procedures performed were analysed using logistic regression. Lead time of the diagnostic pathway was analysed using Cox regression. Analyses were stratified for cancer type and corrected for age, sex (only CRC), stage and region.ResultsFor BC, less mammograms were performed during the first recovery period in 2020. More PET‐CTs were performed during the first peak, first recovery and third peak period. For CRC, less ultrasounds and more CT scans and MRIs were performed during the first peak. Lead time decreased the most during the first peak by 2 days (BC) and 8 days (CRC). Significantly fewer patients, mainly in lower stages, were diagnosed with BC (−47%) and CRC (−36%) during the first peak.ConclusionSignificant impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic was found on the diagnostic pathway, mainly during the first peak. In 2021, care returned to the same standards as before the pandemic. Long‐term effects on patient outcomes are not known yet and will be the subject of future research.

Funder

ZonMw

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3