Affiliation:
1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
2. Department of Surgery Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
3. Department of Pathology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
4. Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands
5. Percuros BV Leiden The Netherlands
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundDifferentiating high‐grade dysplasia (HGD) and T1 colorectal cancer (T1CRC) from low‐grade dysplasia (LGD) in colorectal polyps can be challenging. Incorrect recognition of HGD or T1CRC foci can lead to a need for additional treatment after local resection, which might not have been necessary if it was recognized correctly. Tumor‐targeted fluorescence‐guided endoscopy might help to improve recognition.ObjectiveSelecting the most suitable HGD and T1CRC‐specific imaging target from a panel of well‐established biomarkers: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), c‐mesenchymal‐epithelial transition factor (c‐MET), epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), folate receptor alpha (FRα), and integrin alpha‐v beta‐6 (αvβ6).MethodsEn bloc resection specimens of colorectal polyps harboring HGD or T1CRC were selected. Immunohistochemistry on paraffin sections was used to determine the biomarker expression in normal epithelium, LGD, HGD, and T1CRC (scores of 0–12). The differential expression in HGD‐T1CRC components compared to surrounding LGD and normal components was assessed, just as the sensitivity and specificity of each marker.Results60 specimens were included (21 HGD, 39 T1CRC). Positive expression (score >1) of HGD‐T1CRC components was found in 73.3%, 78.3%, and 100% of cases for CEA, c‐MET, and EpCAM, respectively, and in <40% for FRα and αvβ6. Negative expression (score 0–1) of the LGD component occurred more frequently for CEA (66.1%) than c‐MET (31.6%) and EpCAM (0%). The differential expression in the HGD‐T1CRC component compared to the surrounding LGD component was found for CEA in 66.7%, for c‐MET in 43.1%, for EpCAM in 17.2%, for FRα in 22.4%, and for αvβ6 in 15.5% of the cases. Moreover, CEA showed the highest combined sensitivity (65.0%) and specificity (75.0%) for the detection of an HGD‐T1CRC component in colorectal polyps.ConclusionOf the tested targets, CEA appears the most suitable to specifically detect HGD and T1 cancer foci in colorectal polyps. An in vivo study using tumor‐targeted fluorescence‐guided endoscopy should confirm these findings.
Funder
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Nederlandse Vereniging voor Gastroenterologie
Subject
Gastroenterology,Oncology
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献