Has the therapeutical ceiling been reached in Crohn's disease randomized controlled trials? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Magro Fernando12345ORCID,Moreira Paula Leão2,Catalano Gaia6,Alves Catarina7,Roseira Joana89ORCID,Estevinho Maria Manuela10ORCID,Silva Isabel2,Dignass Axel11ORCID,Peyrin‐Biroulet Laurent12ORCID,Danese Silvio13,Jairath Vipul141516,Dias Claudia Camila417,Santiago Mafalda418

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterology São João University Hospital Center Porto Portugal

2. Clinical Pharmacology Unit São João University Hospital Center Porto Portugal

3. Department of Biomedicine Unit of Pharmacology and Therapeutics Faculty of Medicine University of Porto Porto Portugal

4. CINTESIS—Center for Health Technology and Services Research Porto Portugal

5. RISE—Health Research Network Porto Portugal

6. Università Vita‐Salute San Raffaele Milan Italy

7. Faculty of Medicine University of Porto Porto Portugal

8. Gastroenterology Department Algarve University Hospital Center Faro Portugal

9. ABC—Algarve Biomedical Center Loulé Portugal

10. Department of Gastroenterology Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho EPE Vila Nova de Gaia Portugal

11. Department of Medicine I Agaplesion Markus Hospital Goethe‐University Frankfurt Am Main Germany

12. Department of Gastroenterology and Inserm NGERE U1256 University Hospital of Nancy University of Lorraine Nancy France

13. Gastroenterology and Endoscopy IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita‐Salute San Raffaele Milan Italy

14. Department of Medicine Division of Gastroenterology Western University London Ontario Canada

15. Lawson Health Research Institute Western University London Ontario Canada

16. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Western University London Ontario Canada

17. MEDCIDS ‐ Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences Faculty of Medicine University of Porto Porto Portugal

18. GEDII—Portuguese Inflammatory Bowel Disease Study Group Porto Portugal

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimsThe availability of biological agents for inflammatory bowel disease has increased over the past years. In this systematic review and meta‐analysis, we aimed to explore time trends in clinical response and clinical remission rates in Crohn's disease (CD) patients treated with biologics while discussing the need for new strategies.MethodsMEDLINE, Cochrane, and ISI Web of Science databases were searched for randomized placebo‐controlled trials with biological agents in moderate‐to‐severe CD patients. Sub‐group and meta‐regression analyses compared treatment and placebo by calculating the pooled odds ratios of clinical remission and clinical response, across time categories and publication year. We also estimated the proportion of patients achieving clinical remission and clinical response by comparing both groups according to the publication year.ResultsTwenty‐five trials were included in the systematic review, which enrolled 8879 patients between 1997 and 2022. The clinical remission and clinical response odds, in induction and maintenance, have been constant over time, as no statistically significant differences were found between time categories (interaction p‐values: clinical remission [induction, p = 0.19; maintenance, p = 0.24]; clinical response [induction, p = 0.43; maintenance, p = 0.59]). In meta‐regression analyses, publication year did not influence these outcomes (clinical remission [induction, OR 1.01{95% CI 0.97–1.05}, p = 0.72; clinical response [induction, OR 1.01{95% CI 0.97–1.04]; p = 0.63; maintenance, OR 1.03{95% CI 0.98–1.07}; p = 0.21]), with the exception of clinical remission in maintenance studies, which presented a decreased effect (odds ratio 0.97{95% CI 0.94–1.00}, p = 0.03]).ConclusionsOur review highlights that the odds of clinical outcomes in CD patients receiving biological treatment relative to placebo have been stable in the last decades.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Gastroenterology,Oncology

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3