Assessing social connection for long‐term care home residents: Systematic review using COnsensus‐based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments guidelines

Author:

Dewan Neha12,Sommerlad Andrew34,Chapman Hannah3,Banerjee Sube5,Corazzini Kirsten6,Edvardsson David78,Liougas Madalena P.19,Livingston Gill34,McGilton Katherine S.1910,O'Rourke Hannah M.11,Bethell Jennifer112

Affiliation:

1. KITE Research Institute Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada

2. Department of Physical Therapy Education College of Health Sciences Western University of Health Sciences Oregon USA

3. Division of Psychiatry University College London London UK

4. Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust London UK

5. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Nottingham Nottingham UK

6. College of Health and Human Services The University of New Hampshire Durham USA

7. School of Nursing and Midwifery La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria Australia

8. Sahlgrenska Academy Institute of Health and Care Sciences University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

9. Rehabilitation Sciences Institute Temerty Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

10. Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

11. Faculty of Nursing University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

12. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

Abstract

AbstractSocial connection is important for long‐term care (LTC) residents' quality of life and care. However, there is a lack of consensus on how to measure it and this limits ability to find what improves and impairs social connection in LTC homes. We therefore aimed to systematically review and evaluate the measurement properties of existing measures of social connection for LTC residents, to identify which, if any, measures can be recommended. We searched eight electronic databases from inception to April 2022 for studies which reported on psychometric properties of a measure of any aspect(s) of social connection (including social networks, interaction, engagement, support, isolation, connectedness, and loneliness) for LTC residents. We used COnsensus‐based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines to evaluate the measurement properties reported for each identified measure and make recommendations. We identified 62 studies reporting on 38 measures; 21 measured quality of life, well‐being or life satisfaction and included a social connection subscale or standalone items and 17 measures specifically targeted social connection. We found there was little high‐quality evidence on psychometric properties such as sufficient content validity (n = 0), structural validity (n = 3), internal consistency (n = 3), reliability (n = 1), measurement error (n = 0), construct validity (n = 4), criterion validity (n = 0) and responsiveness (n = 0). No measures demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties on all these aspects, so none could be recommended for use. Thirty‐four measures have the potential to be recommended but require further research to assess their quality and the remaining four are not recommended for use. Our review therefore found that no existing measures have sufficient evidence to be recommended for assessment of social connection in residents of LTC homes. Further validation and reliability studies of existing instruments or the development of new measures are needed to enable accurate measurement of social connection in LTC residents for future observational and interventional studies.Highlights Social connection is fundamental to person‐centered care in long‐term care homes. There is insufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of existing measures. No current measures can be recommended for use based on existing evidence. A reliable and valid measure of social connection is needed for future research.

Funder

Alzheimer's Association

Fondation Brain Canada

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3