Decision making in clinical trials: Interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers

Author:

Welsh‐Bohmer Kathleen A.1,Kerchner Geoffrey A.2,Dhadda Shobha3,Garcia Miguel4,Miller David S.5,Natanegara Fanni6,Raket Lars Lau7,Robieson Weining8,Siemers Eric R.9,Carrillo Maria C.10,Weber Christopher J.10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry & Neurology Duke University Durham North Carolina USA

2. Pharma Research and Early Development F. Hoffmann‐La Roche, Ltd Basel Switzerland

3. Eisai Inc. Nutley New Jersey USA

4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. Ridgefield Connecticut USA

5. Signant Health Blue Bell Pennsylvania USA

6. Eli Lilly and Company Lilly Corporate Center Indianapolis Indiana USA

7. Novo Nordisk A/S Søborg Denmark

8. AbbVie North Chicago Illinois USA

9. ACUMEN Pharmaceuticals Charlottesville Virginia USA

10. Alzheimer's Association Chicago Illinois USA

Abstract

AbstractThe efficient and accurate execution of clinical trials testing novel treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a critical component of the field's collective efforts to develop effective disease‐modifying treatments for AD. The lengthy and heterogeneous nature of clinical progression in AD contributes to the challenges inherent in demonstrating a clinically meaningful benefit of any potential new AD therapy. The failure of many large and expensive clinical trials to date has prompted a focus on optimizing all aspects of decision making, to not only expedite the development of new treatments, but also maximize the value of the information that each clinical trial yields, so that all future clinical trials (including those that are negative) will contribute toward advancing the field. To address this important topic the Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable convened December 1–2, 2020. The goals focused around identifying new directions and actionable steps to enhance clinical trial decision making in planned future studies.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Neurology (clinical)

Reference58 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3