Can tablet video‐based telehealth assessment of the abdomen safely determine the need for abdominal imaging? A pilot study

Author:

Hayden Emily M.1,Borczuk Pierre1,Dutta Sayon1,Filbin Michael R.1,Liu Shan W.1,White Benjamin A.1,Kugener Eleonore1,Parry Blair A.1,Horick Nora2,Zachrison Kori S.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

2. Biostatistics Center Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThere is limited evidence on the reliability of video‐based physical examinations. We aimed to evaluate the safety of a remote physician‐directed abdominal examination using tablet‐based video.MethodsThis was a prospective observational pilot study of patients >19 years old presenting with abdominal pain to an academic emergency department July 9, 2021–December 21, 2021. In addition to usual care, patients had a tablet video‐based telehealth history and examination by an emergency physician who was otherwise not involved in the visit. Both telehealth and in‐person clinicians were asked about the patient's need for abdominal imaging (yes/no). Thirty‐day chart review searched for subsequent ED visits, hospitalizations, and procedures. Our primary outcome was agreement between telehealth and in‐person clinicians on imaging need. Our secondary outcome was potentially missed imaging by the telehealth physicians leading to morbidity or mortality. We used descriptive and bivariate analyses to examine characteristics associated with disagreement on imaging needs.ResultsFifty‐six patients were enrolled; the median age was 43 years (interquartile range: 27–59), 31 (55%) were female. The telehealth and in‐person clinicians agreed on the need for imaging in 42 (75%) of the patients (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62%–86%), with moderate agreement with Cohen's kappa ((k = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.15–0.67). For study patients who had a procedure within 24 hours of ED arrival (n = 3, 5.4%, 95% CI: 1.1%–14.9%) or within 30 days (n = 7, 12.5%, 95% CI: 5.2%–24.1%), neither telehealth physicians nor in‐person clinicians missed timely imaging.ConclusionIn this pilot study, telehealth physicians and in‐person clinicians agreed on the need for imaging for the majority of patients with abdominal pain. Importantly, telehealth physicians did not miss the identification of imaging needs for patients requiring urgent or emergent surgery.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine

Reference16 articles.

1. SamsonL TaraziW TurriniG SheingoldS.Medicare Beneficiaries' Use of Telehealth Services in 2020 – Trends by Beneficiary Characteristics and Location (Issue Brief No. HP‐2021‐27). Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. December 2021.

2. GraberML HunteHE SmithKM.Telediagnosis for Acute Care: Implications for the Quality and Safety of Diagnosis.Rockville MD:Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; August2020. AHRQ Publication No. 20‐0040‐2‐EF.

3. A Review of the Evidence for the Use of Telemedicine Within Stroke Systems of Care

4. CairnsC KangK SantoL.National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2018 emergency department summary tables. Available from:https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhamcs/web_tables/2018_ed_web_tables-508.pdf

5. Use of Physician-Guided Patient Self-Examination to Diagnose Appendicitis: A Telemedicine Case Report

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3