Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Antwerp Wilrijk Belgium
2. ENT, Head and Neck Surgery Antwerp University Hospital Edegem Belgium
3. Multidisciplinary Sleep Disorders Centre Antwerp University Hospital Edegem Belgium
Abstract
ObjectiveTo quantitatively investigate the effect of mandibular advancement devices (MADs) on pharyngeal airway dimensions in a transverse plane as measured during drug‐induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).MethodsData from 56 patients, treated with MAD at 75% maximal protrusion and with baseline Apnea‐Hypopnea Index ≥10 events/h, were analyzed. For each patient, three snapshots were selected from DISE video footage at baseline, with MAD presence, and during chin lift, resulting in 498 images (168/168/162, baseline/MAD/chin lift). Cross‐sectional areas, anteroposterior (AP) and laterolateral (LL) dimensions on both retroglossal and retro‐epiglottic levels were measured. To define the effect of MAD and chin lift on pharyngeal dimensions, linear mixed‐effect models were built. Associations between MAD treatment response and pharyngeal expansion (MAD/chin lift) were determined.ResultsSignificant differences were found between retroglossal cross‐sectional areas, AP, and LL dimensions at baseline and with MAD presence. At a retro‐epiglottic level, only LL dimensions differed significantly with MAD presence compared to baseline, with significant relation of LL expansion ratio to treatment response (p = 0.0176). After adjusting the response definition for the sleeping position, greater retroglossal expansion ratios were seen in responders (1.32 ± 0.48) compared to non‐responders (1.11 ± 0.32) (p = 0.0441). No significant association was found between response and pharyngeal expansion by chin lift.ConclusionOur observations highlight the additional value of quantitative pharyngeal airway measurements during DISE with MAD presence in evaluating MAD treatment outcome. These findings demonstrate an increase in retroglossal airway dimensions during DISE, with MAD presence, and more pronounced increase in retroglossal expansion ratios in MAD treatment responders compared to non‐responders after sleeping position correction.Level of Evidence3 Laryngoscope, 133:3619–3627, 2023